Home Blog Page 15

Superhero versus Reality: The Ultimate Battle (V)

© collider.com

Arthur Poppington is Defendor, masked (although the mask is painted on) vigilante armed with a trench club, a camera strapped to his helmet, and various other small gadgets (such as a jar of ravenous wasps and pouchful of marbles.)

PART THREE: DEFENDOR

The Selfless Defendor

His sole goal within this identity is to find the one responsible for his mother’s death: Captain Industry.  On the prowl, he happens upon a corrupt cop, Dooney, and believes him to be connected to Captain Industry.  The beating he gives Dooney lands him in the nearest police station where Captain Fairbanks, officer responsible for Arthur’s case, notices that Arthur may be mentally challenged and releases him.

Defendor promptly tracks down Dooney once more, but this time, he receives a hard beating at the hands of Dooney’s men.  He’s rescued and brought back to the construction depot he operates out of by Angel, a crackhead prostitute.  Angel, in order to coerce Arthur to let her stay with him, tells him that she knows where Captain Industry is, which Arthur, naturally, believes.  In the meantime, Arthur’s boss and friend, Paul, arrives and is shocked to see where Arthur is, and with whom.  He offers Arthur a place with his family, but Arthur will have none of it.

Arthur quickly stakes out Dooney, but breaks his stealth due to a small accident and is shot.  While he is in the hospital, it is revealed that there is an undercover cop with Dooney, who shot Arthur with training bullets in order not to kill him without blowing his cover.  A semi-conscious Arthur, overhears Angel and Paul talking by his bed, where Angel reveals that her father abused her when she was a child.  Arthur, once fully conscious, proceeds to leave the hospital (still wearing the hospital gown,) find Angel’s father at his dry cleaner’s, beat him, throw him through a window and stick him in a garbage can.  This lands Arthur in court, after a lengthy psychiatric evaluation, whereby he is made to swear he will not be Defendor again.  Without his support, Angel tries to return to Dooney, who takes her hostage and sends a note to Arthur, warning him to stay out.  This prompts Arthur to don the guise of Defendor one final time, this time to save Angel, but Angel manages to escape herself and meets him halfway. Arthur reveals that he intends to go after Captain Industry.

385360-kat_dennings___defendor_movie_stills_001

© screened.com

She confesses that she lied, but Arthur is resolute.  He thus proceeds to make a one-man stand against an arms shipment, and fares very well until “Captain Industry” (actually Radovan Kristic, Russian arms dealer and Mafioso) and he have a stand-off.  Believing himself impervious to bullets (as per the training bullets incident) Arthur is shot several times.  It is revealed in a flashback that “Captain Industry” is a misunderstanding on Arthur’s part: his mother was a drug addict, and died from an overdose.  When his grandfather, in grief, told Arthur that “captains of industry” were responsible for this (albeit, he means indirectly), Arthur took it to heart to mean a single person was responsible.

Arthur dies in Angel’s arms, with Angel promising him to turn her life around.  It is revealed that Defendor, after his final act, has become somewhat of an icon for justice and standing up for what is right, and Angel has picked herself up, after all.

Limitations and Breaks from Reality

“Defendor” is an interesting case study.  It primarily focuses on something touched upon in the previous installments of this series: the insertion of fiction into reality in order to make sense of the act of flatscan heroism.  “Defendor”s take on this is a bit more severe than the previous examples, as Arthur is shown to be somewhat detached from reality on a good day.  His isn’t an insertion of fiction, his is an almost clean break from reality itself, complete with its own set of realities.  His misinterpretation creates this distorted reflection of facts, such as the existence of a villainous Captain Industry who deliberately killed his mother, that he is, in fact, impervious to bullets and is capable of coming out on top – that one, he owes to the various (rare) comic books cluttering his sleeping space.  That Defendor is a bona fide hero, carrying some mannerisms of Batman (especially Woody Harrelson’s magnificent “Batman voice” which is reminiscent of Kevin Conroy’s legendary take) as well as that of comic book cliches (speaking in supposedly “epic” phrases when in costume/character.)

0d20dd8ac306ac6c_large

© mania.com

This break from reality on Arthur’s part does not extend to the world around him, which contrasts his innocent idealism with harsh reality.  As it has been stated prior in this series, the main problem with an act or a series of acts of vigilantism, is that it is illegal.  The first act of Defendor is to assault Dooney, yes, and while corrupt, Dooney is still a police officer.  This lands Arthur in the police station, and the only things that gets him off the hook is the fact that his mental instability is apparent, and the officer interrogating him, Captain Fairbanks, recognizes this.  He does warn Arthur that law enforcement is not his business.

The break from reality in terms of events also does not extend, unfortunately, to Arthur triumphing over all odds, since “Defendor” takes the limitations of flatscan heroism, as mentioned before, as absolute.  Arthur is, when broken down, a civilian who is out in the streets, intending to tangle with corrupt cops and mafia henchmen, whose main weapons of choice are guns and knives.  Arthur has no protective gear, save for knee and elbow pads – his “costume” is a black-on-black outfit with Defendor’s “D” duct-taped on (literally.) The strongest weapon he has is a trench club, his grandfather’s, and his other means of attack include a jar filled with angry wasps (no, really,) marbles to make his opponents slip and fall.  The tape recorder and camera is to record evidence, wherever it may be – but such evidence is inadmissible in court, since it hasn’t been obtained through legal means.

However, while some of the previous breaks were deliberate and involved forceful detachment for the sake of something-or-other, it has to be said that Arthur’s fiction, Defendor, is depicted as being almost entirely innocent.  He genuinely believes in what he is doing, as much as he genuinely believes Captain Industry is out there.  Of course, his innocence is taken out of the realm of the ordinary for the sake of the extraordinary task he has set for himself.  Paul, at one point after his trial, mentions to Arthur that Arthur once saved his son’s life (which is implied to be how they became acquainted) and he wasn’t Defendor when he did that.  This line of reasoning is crucial, since it points to the underlying thought underneath the idea of the movie itself: that a hero isn’t one who wears a cape and flies around, but instead an ordinary man who does, or resolves to do, extraordinary things.

This theme is prevalent in flatscan hero fiction: that it only takes some random person to go out there and start doing something.  “Kick-Ass” gave a more self-serving primary motivation, “Super” dealt with the distractions of a primary goal, but “Defendor”, while presenting a hero with a primary, desired goal, is so much more than just the sum of this particular objective, but is the purity of motivation.  Of course, it could be argued that while most flatscan heroes’ fiction insertion is what “allows” them to become who they are, Arthur’s break from reality is who he is in the first place.

defendor04

© ugo.com

The Choice of Non-Choice

Defendor, as an idea, is an interesting grey area where the issue of whether he actually, consciously chose to become Defendor in the first place.  This feeds into a dichotomy previously mentioned in the “Super” article – that some heroes are chosen, while some choose to be who they become.  In this particular case, it is nearly impossible to tell.

Arthur’s determination and drive indicates, always, that he chose Defendor as an identity, a way to cope with the fact that Captain Industry had killed his mother.  He chooses to be Defendor in order to avenge her death.  But on the other hand, there is the implication that nobody else knows, or worse, cares that Captain Industry killed his mother, which would make his situation one of the chosen hero, instead of the chooser – the responsibility, which comes from this knowledge, falls unto him, because he is the one who is awake.

This is where “Defendor” subtly presents Arthur’s predicament: the choice of no-choice.  A chosen hero in the vein of Spider-Man acts in accordance with a moral code, of having been chosen for this, and there is no avoiding it.  Arthur has no such position far as the allocation of “heroic responsibility” is concerned, thus he chooses to avenge his mother.  But his choice is also driven by the fact that only he knows that Captain Industry exists, and since this knowledge imbues him with a certain responsibility, he feels compelled to act.  It can be said, then, he chooses to be chosen.  He is without a choice in that he is in a unique position – nobody else knows, believes him, or cares.  But he has a choice in becoming Defendor and picking up a vigilante personality, which, Captain Fairbanks also points out, is contrarian: wearing a badge is the surest way to attempt to enforce the law.

The issue is reflected on one of the traits sought after in a hero: self-sacrifice.  It is a core idea that a hero is one willing to sacrifice himself and things pertaining to himself for the sake of other people, for an idea, or just to stop evil on general principle. Defendor’s last stand is built upon this: with nobody else willing to do anything, with Angel abducted and Captain Industry within a position to be found and stopped (lest he continue his evil,) Arthur risks incarceration, physical harm and death just because he, once again, chooses to be chosen: he knows where Captain Industry is, and what’s happening, and while he could simply call the police, he chooses to become Defendor one last time.

Also clouding the issue is the fact that Arthur isn’t playing with a full deck.  The Batman parallel used previously somewhat applies here as well, where the masked vigilante Batman is both what Bruce Wayne feels is his true self, but is also, undeniably insane.  Arthur isn’t quite that far gone yet, but he can’t discern the fact that the fiction of Defendor, an idea that makes perfect sense to him, is an outlier in and of itself.  Becoming Defendor is ultimately, at risk of repeating it, a choice.  But Arthur’s choice isn’t motivated by rationality, choice or a raging need to make sense of it all (a-la Batman,) it’s motivated by his perception that there is a supervillain out there, and the only thing that can stop a supervillain is a superhero.  It is shown that Arthur is a comic book fan, and it is apparent that his flatscan heroism is motivated primarily by his perceptions, as shaped by pure fiction.

Defendor’s End

Unfortunately, “Defendor” takes fiction-insertion into reality prevalent in the concept of a flatscan hero as a mistake, and chooses to plant the said flatscan inside a world he does not completely understand the workings of.  This also parallels the movie’s overall perception that what Defendor is attempting to do isn’t only futile, it’s (fatally) unfeasible.  The latter isn’t something new, as flatscan heroism suffers from several core limitations that have already been outlined, but the previous installment, “Super” had the idea that a flatscan hero can rise to the occasion with the right tools, that is, his enemies’ tools.  Arthur’s insistence that a trench club and marbles is enough to tackle rough-tough gangsters and arms dealers is what makes Arthur a danger to himself – “Defendor” is built on the idea that inserting such fiction into reality will result only in the rejection of the said fiction, since it simply does not (and cannot) mesh with reality.  The term “cruel world” has a certain bearing on this, as the contrast of wide-eyed idealism to cynical realism is what marks “Defendor” and brings Defendor’s end.

Anish Kapoor – huge bean and presence vs. absence

© blog.londonconnection.com

Big cannon which shoots wax to the corner of the gallery, huge mirror bean in the Cloud Gate park which weighs 110 tons and attracts masses of interested visitors from all over the world. These are the works of a British artist of an Indian descent Anish Kapoor. So, if you ever visit Chicago, you must take a photo-shoot of your reflection on the huge mirror bean made of 168 polished stainless steel plates.

Anish Kapoor is one of the most influential sculptors of his generation. Born in Bombay, India, he has lived and worked in London since the early 70’s. Artist has said about his origin: „I am Indian and i am proud of it. Indian life is mythological rich and powerful.“ Kapoor sees his work as being engaged with the deep-rooted metaphysical polarities: presence and absence, being and non-being, place and non-place, the solid and the intangible. Throughout Kapoor’s sculptures his fascination with darkness and light is apparent; the absorbent nature of the pigment, the radiant glow of alabaster and the fluid reflections of stainless steel and water. Through this interplay between form and light, Kapoor aspires to evoke sublime experiences, which address primal physical and psychological states.

nishainpursuit.files.wordpress.com

© nishainpursuit.files.wordpress.com

Anish Kapoor became known in the 1980s for his geometric or biomorphic sculptures made using simple materials such as granite, limestone, marble, pigment and plaster. These early sculptures are frequently simple, curved forms, usually was used monochromatic and brightly colours, also using powder pigment to define and permeate the form. Author says about his early works:

“While making the pigment pieces, it occurred to me that they all form themselves out of each other. So I decided to give them a generic title “A Thousand Names“implying infinity, a thousand being a symbolic number. The powder works sat on the floor or projected from the wall. The powder on the floor defines the surface of the floor and the objects appear to be partially submerged, like icebergs. That seems to fit inside the idea of something being partially there.”

we find winderness.com

© we-find-wilderness.com

Such use of pigment characterized his first high profile exhibit as part of the New Sculpture exhibition at the Hayward Gallery London in 1978.

Exhibition at the Royal Academy of Arts

In September 2009, Kapoor was the first living artist to have a solo exhibition at the Royal Academy of Arts. As well as surveying his career to date it also included new works. On display were “Non-Object“ mirror works, cement sculptures previously unseen, and “Shooting into the Corner“ a cannon that fires pellets of wax into the corner of the gallery. Previously shown at MAK, Vienna in January 2009, this work demonstrate dramatic presence and associations and also continues Kapoor’s interest in the self-made object, as the wax builds up on the walls and floor of the gallery the work slowly oozes out its form.

My-Red-Homeland1

© fluorodigital.com

Kapoor about his art

When asked if engagement with people and places is the key to successful public art, Kapoor said:

“I’m thinking about the mythical wonders of the world, the Hanging Gardens of Babylon and the Tower of Babel. It’s as if the collective will comes up with something that has resonance on an individual level and so becomes mythic. I can claim to take that as a model for a way of thinking. Art can do it, and I’m going to have a damn good go. I want to occupy the territory, but the territory is an idea and a way of thinking as much as a context that generates objects.” Also artist have said that, “artists don‘t make objects. Artists make mythologies. “.

GARAŽŲ VARTAI

How To Be A Middle Eastern Dictator: From High School to Real Life

© midnightreview.co.uk

Imagine international affairs as what is going on in a high school (“counter-factual”).

There are there are young women and men. There are older women and men. There are bullies, there are nerds, there are misfits that could not built up even a decent bit of self-esteem and identity. There are jocks, metal heads, rappers, pop listeners, popular kids. The rich and poor are there, the sick and healthy are present (“actors”). The identities are a mix. But overall, when it is the graduation day comes (“death”, “state failure”), everybody cries except that weird people that is totally alienated from social dogma (“North Korea”).

The social life works on a delicate balance in the high school (balance of power). There are eruptions of violent behavior or dramas based on social crisis (“war”, “civil war”, “insurgency”). Every high school has a written code of rules and unwritten ones. You cross them, you are dead (“rule of law”). Regularity and alienation on this social background is totally constructed on what the bullies and popular kids do (“UN Security Council”). These are all politics. A student with focus and cunning can navigate her/his way out of this mess. Upon starting real life, she/he could realize it is not that different from high school. Application of what had been learned would be wise at this point.

If you want to see an example there is a very interesting one. It is the story of how to be a middle-eastern dictator in 41 easy steps:

  1. Born, to your successful father.
  2. Survive, childhood.
  3. Go to high school.
  4. Make new friends.
  5. Do not try to make friends with the popular kids right away. They need to find about you.
  6. Find a cocky class neighbor that wants to be a bully. Befriend them.
  7. Do good on your classes. They are important.
  8. Have some hobbies.
  9. Don’t give a damn about what others think about you.
  10. Give a damn about what others think about you and use this perceptional gap to manipulate them.
  11. Give respect and play along with bullies. Befriend at least two of them.
  12. Hang out with you cocky neighbor a lot. Be best friends with them.
  13. Be cool together.
  14. When bullies have questions about your relation, get in their circles together.
  15. Be cool for a while.
  16. Upon graduation be nice to everyone.
  17. Never severe your connections with anyone. Go to double dates with your bully friends from time to time.
  18. Survive college.
  19. Go to some fancy college.
  20. Survive your father.
  21. Take place of your father.
  22. Don’t repeat his sins.
  23. Redeem for some of their sins.
  24. People around you might start think you are a dick, show them you can be a dick if you want to.
  25. Be a dick.
  26. When people rise up against you, beat’em up badly.
  27. When you cocky neighbor wants to stop you, seem to agree. But do not care, he is just another wannabe bully anyways.
  28. Have enemies as evil as you. So you will be seen as lesser evil.
  29. Have you real bully friends from high school who are still bullies, to defend you.
  30. Constantly damage your cocky neighbor’s image. That will make him more angry and cocky every day. You will look cool instead.
  31. As war against you heats up repeat your father’s sins.
  32. Murder, rape, and destroy.
  33. Use, tanks, airplanes, bombs, machetes, bullets, bare hands, teeth.
  34. NEVER, EVER USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS.
  35. In case you use, tell people you have not.
  36. If they found out that you used them, have others vouch for you.
  37. Have your enemies use chemical weapons if you can.
  38. Sustain your image as lesser evil.
  39. Have fun, if you can.
  40. Get some kids.
  41. Repeat from beginning.

Galite iš karto užsisakyti draudimą

There Will Be Brawl: Nintendo Noir

© fanfilms.wikia.com

Media, if broken into separate categories, lends itself to cross-wiring: some types of media products can be (at least attempted to) translated into other types.  We can observe this in the wave of “adaptations” that plagues the movie industry, all translating (or, rather, transducing and often imperfectly, due to the nature of the media type involved) one type of media into another.

Signal Transduction

Transducing games or game series into movies, cartoons, comics or short films (that rarely exceed ten to fifteen minutes) is common.  “There Will Be Brawl” (henceforth TWBB) is a different kind of signal transduction: that of many different Nintendo games (themselves united in the “Super Smash Bros.” fighting game series prior) into a web-based, live-action limited series.

The series is a bit of a hail from the recent past: it was firstly and largely streamed during 2009 on www.escapist.com.  Written by  Zach Gaffron and Matthew Mercer, directed by Matthew Mercer, the series quickly achieved critical acclaim due to its unique style and firm grip on the Smash Bros. (and, to an extent, the Nintendo) verse.  Consisting of ten episodes in total, TWBB marked its territory, and no encroachment has been seen since.

090702-greg-de-stefano-1

 © Greg de Stefano

The Mushroom Kingdom Was Not Always Like This

The setting and the plot are brilliant: Mushroom Kingdom is a dystopian urban hell in which several mafia dons rule and fight, and the heroes of once try to navigate the strange, dark new world, in the only ways they know how. Some have adapted, but the more old-fashioned brawlers have failed to do so.  Mushroom Kingdom is home to everything from gangs, prostitution to rigged boxing matches and illegal Pokemon fighting rings (yes, that’s right.) When the latest in a string of disappearances and murders comes to a head with the disappearance of Princess Peach, who was on the same trail, Luigi sets out to investigate on account of Mario coping with the event by popping pills (“vitamins,” an allusion to the Dr. Mario games) and whiskey.  He’s beset on all sides by fallen, bitter heroes and frustrated, power-mongering villains, as well as a few unlikely allies.  He gradually uncovers conspiracies, background power plays that go right down to the foundations of what has made the Mushroom Kingdom what it is today.

The series, as stated, is an interesting take on the Nintendo Universe, one that cooks the shiny, colourful games in the sauce of pure, cruel reality.  However, it does not attempt to make it so realistic that it’d negate using the Nintendo ‘verse in the first place.  “There Will Be Brawl” exists in the cracks left by the open-ended worlds presented within the context of the games.  A running theme is that heroes cannot exist in a world beset on all sides by greed, corruption, brutal violence, monetary concerns, i.e. the daily grind that the rest of us have to face, if we lived in a very bad neighborhood.  Also prevalent because of this sharp turn into a semi-reality is how the characters themselves have been affected by this new world that they walk, calling back to some of the very first games that brought these characters forth to deconstruct each and every one of them.

Visually, the Mushroom Kingdom appears to be no different than a semi-metropolis anywhere.  High-rise skyscrapers looming over the red-brick projects and low-income suburbs, which stands in garish contrast to the colorful city-dwellers walking the streets.  We are treated to the seedy underbelly of the Mushroom Kingdom, with gambling hideouts, secret passageways, strip joints, sleazy bars and bar/brothels (all in the hands of game characters, of course.) Apropos, also contrasted are the kinds of things these characters are driven to do in order to navigate the brave new Mushroom Kingdom.

BRAWL_GregDeStefano_23

 © Greg de Stefano

Choose Your Fighter

“There Will Be Brawl” features a wide cast, each one worked in as much detail as possible.  With the exclusion of cameos, the main/relevant cast hail from: Donkey Kong, Super Mario Bros, The Legend of Zelda, Metroid, F-Zero, Kid Icarus, Star Fox Adventures, Sonic the Hedgehog, Metal Gear Solid, Pikmin, Kirby’s Dreamland (series), Mario Party, Fire Emblem, Sin and Punishment, Golden Sun, Ice Climber, Pokemon (series), Earthbound, Mother 3 and Punch Out!!! This also marks the only drawback of the series is that, while the crux of the plot, as well as the novelty of its setting and execution will hit home, the nuances and some of the in-jokes can fly over one’s head, if one doesn’t have at least a cursory knowledge of the series mentioned.

The characters are twisted wonderfully.  To elaborate: Luigi is a trenchcoat-wearing private dick, complete with voiceover narration; Mario is a short-fused, misanthropic, violent drunk; Wario is an opportunistic hustler who always “knows a guy who knows a guy”; Samus Aran is a stripper/escort/hooker; Captain Falcon runs a gay bar and Pit (from Kid Icarus) is his lover; Link is police chief, a position also occupied by Zelda; Sonic is a wheelchair-bound immigrant; Ganondorf is a shadowy, secretive mafia don; the Ice Climbers have become hammer-wielding psychopaths who, apparently, get off on their victims crying.

Last but not least, Kirby is re-imagined as a Hannibal-like figure, inspiring fear and revulsion with a mere utterance (and the way he is done, visually, is downright frightening.) He is presented as a voracious, monstrous, malevolent yet highly intelligent figure, able to read people he is conversing with perfectly with nothing more than a cursory glance, and able to manipulate those he is in contact with.  Even when off-screen, he is present, for the events that took place prior to the series center around him.

As such, the background of the setting is dropped in conversation and the occasional, scarce flashback, and it makes for an interesting reflection on how modernization destroyed the decidedly rural order of things.  That each character comes with a built-in purpose and/or backstory allows for a lot of wriggle room, which is utilized to the fullest.  For instance, Hyrule, Ganondorf reveals, was annexed by the Mushroom Kingdom because of economic collapse.  Samus Aran’s work as an escort/hooker is a result of her bounties drying up, something ensured by Captain Falcon’s efforts.  Solid Snake lives in the immigrant quarter (in a cardboard box, of course) because he is a shell-shocked veteran.  And all of this was set off by an actually sound interpretation of how Kirby’s main form of attack worked: Kirby, apparently, went on a killing spree in the Mushroom Kingdom, his modus operandi earning him the nickname “The Cannibal.” This is an allusion to the fact that in his very first game, the only weapon Kirby had was to swallow his enemies and spit them out as destructive stars.  The fear that he generated plunged the entire realm into chaos, creating, effectively, the present situation.  Even years after the fact, the Mushroom Kingdom still speaks of the Cannibal with fear and disgusted reverence.

BRAWL_GregDeStefano_07

 © Greg de Stefano

-SIC-

There are many small in-jokes and references peppered throughout the series.  For instance, at one point, Mario walks into King Dedede’s bar, and the bartender is Pauline – the first abducted girl that Mario (then only known as the “Jumpman”) had to save (from Donkey Kong.) In later games, Pauline would be replaced by Princess Peach, which Pauline alludes to by hinting that she has had an on-again, off-again relationship with Mario.  Solid Snake occupying a cardboard box in the immigrant neighborhood is an allusion to how he often used cardboard boxes to sneak around.  Link once utters the line “Well, excuse me, princess! But I’ve heard that legend before.” This is a shout out to two Zelda-related products: the 1989 cartoon (where “Well, excuse me, princess!” is Link’s catchphrase) and the fact that the game series has the main title of “The Legend of Zelda.”

At times, the characters also fall into this.  For instance, Wario’s brother, Waluigi is portrayed as a mentally challenged, child-like individual.  Since Waluigi was first brought to the fore in the Mario Party game series, in the only two scenes he’s there, he often spouts references to suit this, such as suggesting that it’s “a Mario party” (with Mario and Luigi there as well) or asking if they want to play tennis.  Link is often seen arguing with Zelda as she is Sheik, the cross-gendered (male) warrior, which he uses in an insult to call Zelda a “bipolar, crossdressing psychopath.” Ganondorf, in a meeting involving Captain Falcon, states that he and the Captain “are a lot more similar than (Luigi) thinks,” hinting at the fact that in the game of Super Smash Bros. Brawl, these characters have the same move-set.

This, in turn, makes the series a very firmly-grounded one.  There are, admittedly a few mistakes, and performances can be uneven at times, as well as budgetary constraints apparent, but where TWBB excels is in making these otherwise crucial aspects unimportant via a solid plot, good dialogue, a firm grasp on the characters and a vice-grip on what it wants to be, and how far it wants to go, which is what makes it so formidable.

Dineta web programa

TOP 10: The biggest art auction sales of the last year

Art is an expensive thing… Good art is very expensive. Would you pay 87 million dollars just because Mark Rothko elementary tree color combination would decorate your house interior? Or maybe you will not grudge 48 million dollars for Raphael diptych which was created in Renaissance period?

So, this time I introduce the hardly believable prices of the Art Auction Sales of the last year and while you will be reading, you can decide whether you love art so much.  Let‘s see how much money people pay for good art and also, let me introduce some facts about the authors of these expensive works.

  1. Edvard Munch „The Scream“ – $119.9 million. AUTHOR: Edvard Munch is a Norwegian painter and printmaker whose intensely evocative treatment of psychological themes built upon some of the main tenets of late 19th century Symbolism. ARTWORK: „The Scream“ is Munch’s most famous work and one of the most recognizable paintings in all art. It has been widely interpreted as representing the universal anxiety of modern man. With this painting, Munch met his stated goal of “the study of the soul, that is to say the study of my own self”.

 

1.-Edvard-Munch-–-„The-Scream“

2. Mark Rothko “Orange, Red, Yellow” – $87 million. AUTHOR: Mark Rothko is an American painter of Latvian Jewish descent. He is generally identified as an Abstract Expressionist, although he himself rejected this label and even resisted classification as an “abstract painter”. ARTWORK: Souren Melikian of The New York Times described Rothko’s Orange, Red, Yellow as one that “…can convincingly be argued to be the most powerful of all his pictures”. Kelly Crow of the Wall Street Journal stated that “The painting’s trio of orange and yellow rectangles bobbing atop a cherry-red background forms a palette that’s as eye-catching as a sunset or a Popsicle”.

2.-Mark-Rothko-„Orange-Red-Yellow”

3. Mark Rothko “No. 1 (Royal Red and Blue)” – $75.1 million. ARTWORK: is seen by critics as one of the finest examples of Rothko’s characteristic style – a seemingly simple, but arresting juxtaposition of blocks of color.

3.-Mark-Rothko-No.-1-Royal-Red-and-Blue

4.  Raphael “Head of a Young Apostle” – $47.8 million. AUTHOR: Raphael is an Italian painter and architect of the High Renaissance. His work is admired for its clarity of form and ease of composition and for its visual achievement of the Neoplatonic ideal of human grandeur. ARTWORK: that depicts one of the primary figures from Raphael’s “Transfigurations.” Created circa 1519-1520.

4.-Raphael-Head-of-a-Young-Apostle

5.  Roy Lichtenstein “Sleeping Girl” – $44.9 million. AUTHOR: Roy Lichtenstein is an American pop artist. His works defined the basic premise of pop art better than any other through parody. ARTWORK: The painting is based on the 1964 comic book series Girls’ Romances edition #105 published by DC National Comics. The artist for the original panel was Tony Abruzzo.

Roy Lichtenstein?s Sleeping Girl painting fetches $45 million at Sotheby?s

6. Francis Bacon “Figure Reflected in a Mirror” $44.9 million. AUTHOR: Francis Bacon was an Irish-born British figurative painter known for his bold, graphic and emotionally raw imagery. Bacon’s painterly but abstracted figures typically appear isolated in glass or steel geometrical cages set against flat, nondescript backgrounds. ARTWORK: The painting incorporates some of Bacon’s most important themes and iconography. It shows a male figure in white underwear who bears a resemblance to the artist’s lover George Dyer, who killed himself on the eve of Bacon’s important retrospective.

6.-Francis-Bacon-Figure-Reflected-in-a-Mirror

7. Claude Monet “Water Lillies” – $43.8 million. AUTHOR: Monetwas a founder of French impressionist painting, and the most consistent and prolific practitioner of the movement’s philosophy of expressing one’s perceptions before nature. ARTWORK: A work is from Monet’s “Water Lilies” series, depicting a pond in Giverny, France.

7

8.  Andy Warhol “Statue of Liberty” – $43.7 million. AUTHOR: Andy Warhol was an American artist who was a leading figure in the visual art movement known as pop art. His works explore the relationship between artistic expression, celebrity culture and advertisement. ARTWORK: The statue is depicted 24 times, in four rows of six images. Silkscreened in red over green ink on white background, the work has a three-dimensional effect. “If you put on 3-D glasses, it becomes a grainy, black and white 3-D photograph,” said Brett Gorvy.

8.-Andy-Warhol-„Statue-of-Liberty”-–-43.7

9. Franz Kline “Untitled” – $40.4 million. AUTHOR: Franz Kline was an American painter mainly associated with the abstract expressionist movement centered around New York in the 1940s and 1950s. ARTWORK: The untitled piece belongs to the series of black and white abstractions for which Kline is known, combining aggressive brushstrokes with simple forms reminiscent of Japanese calligraphy.

81

10. Andy Warhol “Double Elvis” – $37 million. ARTWORK: Double Elvis originally belonged to a long, continuous canvas of Elvises that was later cut and stretched into multiple paintings. The artist’s interest in film might explain why he created Elvis in double – the singer/actor appears to be moving back and forth, as if in a film strip.

AALX001131

Skaldytos Malkos

The lessons of boundless pragmatism

© Wikimedia Commons

The Gordian Knot of Syria is cut. It was done by no one else but the president of the USA Barack Obama – the person who clearly does not want to be involved in the conflict that is not useful for the big powers.

Moreover, as one retired Israeli general said, the fight in Syria is not among the good and the bad. In Syria the bad ones are fighting the even worse ones. It seems that this is the truth. That is why the suggestion to confiscate the chemical weapons from al Assad fell like manna from of the sky. Therefore, as I have predicted before, there will be no World War III, and the situation in the Middle East – business as usual.

The secretary of the State John Kerry not accidently suggested that chemical weapons of Syria should be confiscated. Russians got hooked up on that also. Maybe Obama talked about this with Putin at G20. The phone lines are heated because of the talks among USA, Russia and Arab League.

Say what you want but if the US hadn’t threatened to attack Syria (even if it had hard time doing so), Russians would not have pulled themselves together. And Obama would have to take actions even if he does not want to. Because the USA only threatens once. This is the responsibility of the world’s policeman. And who wants to be the policeman of the world? It is better that this is done by the USA than China or Russia.

So, the president Obama after he faced the judgment of the Congress probably avoided the dangerous conflict. And not only the conflict: his colleague in Russia was also able to keep its honor. Mow both of them will claim the rights to have managed to find this solution. How do people say? And sheep is safe and wolf is full.

But the sheep is not the sheep. It is a wolf. And if nothing happens, 100 000 more Syrians will be killed.

All kinds of political Western humanists will cry about the lost lives, Russians will celebrate that they did not lose their influence in the middle East, morally right analysts will complain about this endless pragmatism which is cynicism really. It is only cynicism and nothing else.

Who won? Not democracies. But does that mean that democracies have to take all the responsibility for the atrocities done by dictators? Even the sentence “It is not our business” should creep us out. We again see the entire massacre and realize that we have lost all hope not to be cynical observers.

Political consensus with dictators that does not bring salvation for ordinary people in any war run by dictators in any part of the world – such a consensus is not just immoral: it tramples the imperative of moral supremacy of democracy over dictatorship.

So how we are different from all those killers? The right thing to do in this situation would be helping those who suffer. If this is not done, the apathy becomes a norm.

Now the USA and the EU need to find other means to deal with Russia and Arab dictators to stop killings in Syria. But some like Nobel Peace prize winner Adolf Pérez Esquivel blame the USA for getting into “not their business”. Like without the USA, the world would be a heaven.

Well, it is true that the massacre continued in Iraq and Afghanistan. No powerful state could beat their chests and swear that they have not been driven by double standards at some point. In other words, when ethics leave politics, the trust in politicians and politics vanishes. Then the “street laws” take over. So these are the lessons of endless pragmatism for those who want to learn from them.

Superhero versus Reality: The Ultimate Battle (IV)

a still from the movie Super © screened.com

Frank Darbo has it all.  He’s married to beautiful Sarah, and marrying her is one of the two perfect moments of his life.  The second moment is when a burglar ran past him, and he pointed the chasing police officer in the right direction.  He does not want anything else.

PART TWO: SUPER

Perfect Moments

Except Sarah, a recovering heroin addict, falls into the clutches of Jacques – the suave, charming drug dealer.  Unable to keep her from leaving him, Frank is left desolate.  In desperation, he turns to God, and asks for a vision, a sign, anything to guide him.  The answer comes to him in a dream: Frank is to become the Crimson Bolt, masked vigilante, and save Sarah.  To this end, Frank first visits the local comic book store, where a power-charged clerk named Libby helps him conclude that one does not need superpowers to be a superhero.  Thus, Frank purchases various items (American football guards, helmet, etc.) and puts together his costume.  His weapon of choice: a wrench.  His policy towards crime: zero tolerance.  His catchphrase: “Shut up, Crime!”

Frank then proceeds to inflict his brand of justice upon the streets: a swift, merciless wrench blow to the head (or, in one case, a cinder block dropped from the second story fire escape.) The Crimson Bolt’s methods are effective, so effective, in fact, that after he gives a man brain damage for butting in line, and breaks the face of his wife in the process, the police begin the search for the identity of the violent lunatic loose in the streets.  Prompted to take further action, the Crimson Bolt launches a one-man raid of Jacques’ premises as he’s using Sarah as a test subject for a new brand of heroin he’s going to distribute.  With Jacque’s henchmen and guards around, Frank barely manages to escape with a bullet in his leg.  He goes to the only person whom he knows can help him: Libby.

tumblr_m7clp4oj3h1r2fm7to2_1280

Boltie © radiumradiator.tumblr.com

Upon discovering that Frank is the Crimson Bolt, Libby is beyond ecstatic.  She quickly sets herself up to be Boltie, the Crimson Bolt’s kid sidekick (with a costume that resembles Jean Grey’s second “Marvel Girl” outfit.) The dynamic duo, after almost being killed by Jacques’ men, decide to up their operation and purchase a variety of firearms, dynamite, make pipe bombs, etc.  They launch, this time, a two-hero raid of Jacques’ premises in the night of Jacques’ big deal.  Libby dies by a shotgun blast to the head in the opening salvoes of their operation.  This provokes Frank to go berserk and clean out the entire premises himself, kill Jacques after a one-on-one, and at long last, save Sarah.

Challenge for the Mind

Frank’s shift from Frank Darbo to the Crimson Bolt, the ordinary to extraordinary is akin to the tragic origin story of Batman, in fact, there are, despite the Crimson Bolt existing in a strange mesh of genres that includes comedy.  Namely, Frank’s stability was, apparently, based almost solely on Sarah, and his marriage.  The sudden relapse of Sarah into heroin abuse and his inability to save her from her addiction pushes Frank into an extraordinary sense of loss and depression.  It is at that point that he admits to seeing hallucinations as a child.  The “vision” he receives from “God” for him to become the Crimson Bolt is simply the first pointer towards an age-old theme in many superhero stories, but is the clearest in Batman.  Bruce Wayne was transformed into a vigilante because of the loss of his parents, but the specific guise he dons is initially because a bat chose to fly in through the window as he’s contemplating his identity.  He takes it as an omen and decides to become a bat.  Likewise, Frank Darbo is transformed by the loss of the one person that he held dear above all else, and finds his “skin” when a lucid hallucination gives him the visage of the Crimson Bolt, in the form of his helmet.

super 5 (1)

A still from the movie Super © lightsremoteaction.com 

In another parallel, there is always a question about whether or not Batman himself qualifies as sane, not because he is driven to a point far beyond obsession, or because he devotes most of his time to crime-fighting.  Those are perhaps questionable, but not to the point where we can deem him insane. Where the cup runneth over, however, is that while he could do it all in any black ops kind of outfit, he chooses to do it dressed up like a bat – furthermore, Bruce Wayne does not even exist, as he deems “the Batman” to be his true identity.  This isn’t a clear-cut case where the Crimson Bolt is concerned, as Frank creates the Crimson Bolt to be an extension of himself, rather than a replacement, or a self that can force a senseless world to make sense.  His sole mission begins as saving Sarah, but the path he paves towards that takes him down to a different, more over-arching thought: that society has certain rules that must be followed, and these rules are neither optional, nor subject to change, and trespasses must be punished.  Shut up, crime.

This is clearly put forth at the end of Crimson Bolt’s showdown with Jacques.  Jacques, down for the count, facing a knife-wielding Crimson Bolt, points out that Frank, at least partially unstable, has hospitalized people for butting in line.  Enraged, Frank screams that you don’t butt in line, you don’t sell drugs, you don’t molest children – them’s the rules.  The question shifts, as Jacques, naturally, wants to know if Frank thinks stabbing him to death is going to make a difference.  “Super”s theme of self-righteous intervention becomes clear in the answer that Frank provides, which is “I can’t know that for sure, unless I try.” (and yes, after that, he proceeds to stab Jacques to death.)

But, the line isn’t so clear-cut.  “Super” elaborates on the basic dichotomy of superhero fiction, that of being chosen versus choosing.  To briefly expand, Superman is chosen, because his abilities are a by-product of where he is from, and what the solar radiation allows him to do.  His powers are given to him.  He is chosen.  Since he is aware of this, he feels compelled to act.  Batman, our main parallel with the Crimson Bolt, chooses.  He chooses to act.  The Crimson Bolt as an identity, a path, comes to Frank in a vision and he believes himself chosen.  It takes him the completion of his quest (for which a hero is often chosen, as well) he comes to the very real conclusion that he was not “chosen,” because he wasn’t given anything – he chose.  He chose to purposefully become the Crimson Bolt, to assume this separate identity.

 tumblr_m7clp4oj3h1r2fm7to1_1280

 A still from the movie Super © radiumradiator.tumblr.com

Grey and Grey Morality: Ideation and Crossfire

As stated above, Frank, at one point, attempts a one-man raid on Jacques’ mansion, and escapes with a bullet in his leg.  He wraps himself up in trash bags and stumbles into a flatwarming.  Libby helps him, insofar as she is able, to wrap his leg up.  At this point, another reality is observed in “Super”; Frank spends quite a bit of time recovering from the gunshot.  In the meantime, Libby becomes obsessed with becoming the Crimson Bolt’s kid sidekick, citing such examples as Robin and Kid Flash as to the necessity of such a thing – an attempt to force the pure fiction into reality, as is with most flatscan heroes.  The reality vs. fiction is further reinforced in practically the next scene, where Frank is trying to ease his leg back into walking (having still not recovered) but Libby is busy demonstrating her alter-ego Boltie’s costume.  It’s akin to, we may note, Jean Grey’s second Marvel Girl outfit, and in her demonstration, aptly, “Boltie” strikes a few poses, one of them being similar to one of Jean-Grey-as-the-Phoenix’s trademark drawings.

Boltie is a testament to the very basic premise of a flatscan hero, the catalyst of the personification: ideation.  Libby is shown to be even more unstable than Frank, and as such, her ideation is stronger.  She practically forces the idea of a kid sidekick on Frank, pushes her fiction through Frank’s already shaky reality.  The dangers of flatscan heroism ideations are shown almost immediately: the first act of Boltie is, after being bored with Frank’s style of “hiding behind a dumpster and waiting for crime to happen” is to point out that he knows a guy who keyed her friend’s car.  They find his house, walk in, and in the ensuing struggle, Boltie smashes a crystal vase over the head of the criminal – Frank barely stops her when she, completely lost in the moment, proceeds to pick up a nearby, heavy, decorative object to beat his brains in.  However, it is quickly revealed that Boltie isn’t one hundred percent sure that the person they just assaulted was the actual culprit.  The difficulty of ascertaining guilt is a problem plaguing formal law enforcement even today: things such as evidence, third-party witnesses are necessary, and procedure requires that a point “beyond a reasonable doubt” has to be achieved.  But flatscan heroes, though attempting to observe the law, can not be expected to act in the same framework, because they simply do not have the resources.  This lack, “Super” demonstrates, can easily translate into blurry aim.

The level of instability required to attempt at flatscan heroism has another dimension.  As established, Boltie is dangerously unstable, too eager to lose herself in the fiction and unable to discern the consequences of her actions (not that Frank, the man who thinks a wrench blow to the head amounts to justice, fares any better, we might add.) This culminates in a rather difficult scene where Libby, now full-on Boltie, forces herself on a shocked Frank, practically raping him.  That particular scene returns the focus briefly to the discussion of identity splitting.  Libby claims that Frank Darbo, since he is married, cannot have sex with Libby (other reasons notwithstanding) however, The Crimson Bolt can have sex with Boltie.  It is a very subtle, if disturbing way of putting forth the question of how separate can one person’s two identities, no matter in how different realms they exist, be.  The scene, difficult to navigate as it is, makes it clear (and relevant) that Boltie’s interest isn’t in Frank, contributing to her fiction, once again, overwhelming reality.  In fact, not very long into the act, she grabs Frank’s mask from nearby and tries (with Frank, somewhat vehemently, resisting) to put it on, stating that she “loves the way he looks in his mask.”

Of course, there is something to be said about harsh twists bringing back reality.  Frank comes to the realization, after another, brief hallucination immediately following the above the scene, that he has fallen very far from his original goal of saving Sarah.  This is what leads him to take the weapons (actual firearms) he has purchased with Boltie, and launch a two-hero assault on Jacques’ house just as a rather modest drug deal is going down.  Fiction overwhelming the reality that pushed him into this mess in the first place becomes his wake-up call, as Frank seemingly realizes that there are certain realities that must be observed in order for his fiction to make sense.  Which is akin, once again, to Batman, whose vigilantism was a fiction to distance himself from said realities, and force everything to settle into a context of his own making, a context that would allow him control.

Fictitious Enemy, Real Force

It must be mentioned here that the depiction of violence, in general, has a no-holds barred approach.  The wounds Frank inflicts upon his targets during his initial stint as the Crimson Bolt are bared, blood and all – there is no question that he is severely injuring those he chooses to dispatch.  This, in and of itself, serves a testament to the dichotomy of fiction vs. reality in a flatscan hero setting.  Frank’s response to all but two instances of his own use of force is a kind of glee, and the ridiculousness of a man wearing a made-up costume and mask boldly declaring his catchphrase is the fiction that exists not side-by-side, but simultaneously as this reality.  The two exceptions to this, the first of which is very brief, is when Frank shoots one of Jacques’ men after being attacked by him, to which his first response is shock.

The second instance marks a very sharp turn in the tone of the movie, which gradually breaks away from the comedy that is one of the primary genres prevalent.  Not too long into their operation, the Crimson Bolt and Boltie, not ones for stealth, are detected.  They are shot at, and two shots land.  Frank survives due to the bullet landing on his bulletproof vest.  Half of Boltie’s face gets blown clean off, and the image is shown enough to ram home the point that the fiction of the Crimson Bolt that has lightened the otherwise brutal, yet sparse violence, has been erased completely.  Frank, flying into a rage, emerges from this an unstoppable force and begins to mow the grunts of Jacques and his buyer down, one by one by one.  The movie pours salt into the wound by inserting Adam West-era Batman-esque sound effects to each and every kill, while showing the moment the bullets (or shotgun pellets) exited the wounds.  Another scene, where Frank dispatches Jacques’ main man, Abe, occurs with Frank repeatedly ramming Abe’s head into the edge of the platform housing the nearby chimney.  In short, “Super” constantly, yet subtly, reinforces the reality that violence, no matter what the context, cannot be taken lightly.

Next, on “Superhero vs. Realism: The Ultimate Battle”

On the final installment of this series, we will observe “Defendor” and its themes of what heroism entails, with a particular emphasis on heroic sacrifice not just in the sense of a single such act, but as a general way of existing, and what innocence means in a world of corruption.  Be warned that the final installment concerns the highest level of reality and bares the limitations of a flatscan heroism attempt.

What Bradley Manning’s Sentence Will Tell Us About Our Military Justice System

Michael Moore © Wikimedia Commons

Today Bradley Manning was convicted on 20 of 22 counts, including violating the Espionage Act, releasing classified information and disobeying orders. That’s the bad news. The good news is he was found not guilty on the charge of “aiding the enemy.” That’s ’cause who he was aiding was us, the American people. And we’re not the enemy. Right?

Manning now faces a potential maximum sentence of 136 years in jail. When his sentence is announced, we’ll all get a good idea of how seriously the U.S. military takes different crimes. When you hear about how long Manning – now 25 years old – will be in prison, compare it to sentences received by other soldiers:

Col. Thomas M. Pappas, the senior military intelligence officer at Abu Ghraib and the senior officer present the night of the murder of Iraqi prisoner Manadel al-Jamadi, received no jail time. But he was reprimanded and fined $8,000. (Pappas was heard to say about al-Jamadi, “I’m not going down for this alone.”)

Sgt. Sabrina Harman, the woman famously seen giving a thumbs-up next to al-Jamadi’s body and in another photo smiling next to naked, hooded Iraqis stacked on each other in Abu Ghraib, was sentenced to six months for maltreating detainees.

Spec. Armin Cruz was sentenced to eight months for abusing Iraqis at Abu Ghraib and covering up the abuse.

Spc. Steven Ribordy was sentenced to eight months for being accessory to the murder of four Iraqi prisoners who were “bound, blindfolded, shot and dumped in a canal” in Baghdad in 2007.

Spc. Belmor Ramos was sentenced to seven months for conspiracy to commit murder in the same case.

Sgt. Michael Leahy Jr. was sentenced to life in prison for committing the four Baghdad murders. The military then granted him clemency and reduced his sentence to 20 years, with parole possible after seven.

Marine Sgt. Frank D. Wuterich received no jail time for negligent dereliction in the massacre of 24 unarmed men, women and children in 2005 in the Iraqi town of Haditha. Seven other members of his battalion were charged but none were punished in any way.

Marine Lance Cpl. Jerry Shumate and Lance Cpl. Tyler Jackson were both sentenced to 21 months for the aggravated assault of Hashim Ibrahim Awad, 52, a father of 11 and grandfather of four, in Al Hamdania in 2006. Awad died after being shot during the assault. Their sentences were later reduced.

Marine Lance Cpl. Robert Pennington was sentenced to eight years for the same incident, but served only a few months before being granted clemency and released from prison.

Marine Sgt. Lawrence G. Hutchins III was sentenced to 15 years for murder in the Awad case but his conviction was soon overturned and he was released.

No soldiers received any punishment for the killing of five Iraqi children, four women and two men in one Ishaqi home in 2006. Among the U.S. diplomatic cables leaked by Bradley Manning was email from a UN official stating that U.S. soldiers had “executed all of them.” When Wikileaks published the cable, the uproar in Iraq was so big that the Nouri al-Maliki government couldn’t grant any remaining U.S. troops immunity from prosecution in Iraqi courts, thus forcing the Obama administration to abandon its plans to keep several thousand U.S. soldiers in Iraq permanently. All U.S. troops were removed at the end of 2011.

My guess is Bradley Manning will spend more time in jail than all of the other soldiers in all of these cases put together. And thus, instead of redeeming ourselves and asking forgiveness for the crimes that Spc. Manning exposed, we will reaffirm to the world who we really are.

Sourse: michaelmoore.com

Superhero versus Reality: The Ultimate Battle (III)

© comiclist.com

While this series of articles regards flat scan would-be heroes in an at least quasi-realistic setting, Kick-Ass 2 in this context will be based on the comic.  This is done because I have not been able to catch the movie version, and I do not believe the central themes to Kick-Ass 2 will change when it’s adapted for the silver screen.

AN ASIDE: KICK-ASS 2 

In Theory

The realism of Kick-Ass as a movie is suspect, as it has been said.  However, Kick-Ass 2 will inevitably rectify that in the sense that it touches upon a few things swept under the rug in the case of superhero stories.

The first is collateral damage.  In a pure fantasy setting, collateral damage is shown mostly either to dramatic effect, or to make a point.  Tall buildings fall, cars get tossed around, but what is often ignored is how much this flak catches actual, innocent civilians simply going their way prior to the outburst of action.  What’s more, while villains target civilians as a way to get their point across, or “for the evuls,” they are almost always explicitly to get the attention of or get to the hero.  Villains existing for total destruction are often regarded with spite even in the villain communities.

If we may return to Batman for a moment, there is often a question as to whether Batman responds to his rogues gallery of costumed, thematic villains, or creates them instead.  A particularly good thesis on this was the animated series, “The Trial” where Batman is put to a trial in Arkham Asylum (with Joker as the judge and Two-Face as the prosecutor) with the charge that his brand of justice was what made the villains who they are now.  The winning argument from Batman’s appointed attorney was that if it weren’t for Batman’s overall theme, they would still be criminals – simply without their antics.

ka-570x365

© sneakpeek.ca

In Practice

The issue of an action-reaction relationship of masked figures’ existences is taken two-fold in Kick-Ass 2.  First is the appearance of other, more costumed superheroes, including one of Dave’s friends.  Their existence is largely due to the stand one scrawny kid took and managed to come out of on top – it is stated explicitly that Kick-Ass inspired others to do more to help the world be a better place.  This has led to the formation of Justice Forever, a shout-out to the Justice League, that is basically a group of flatscan heroes gathered together to benefit from each other’s experiences and group solidarity.

Of course, heroes beget villains, and Red Mist, whom had become an internet troll at the end of Kick-Ass remakes himself as The Mother-Fucker, ruthless super villain.  Using his father’s money, The Mother-Fucker puts together a brutally effective super villain group together, named, quite appropriately, The Toxic Mega-Cunts.  Cut from a far more psychopathic cloth than Justice Forever, The Toxic Mega-Cunts, with the leadership The Mother-Fucker, begin to cut a swath through the city, all in the name of revenge for Frank D’Amico.  While the group assembles under the flag of a villain who has it in for Kick-Ass, specifically, the rest of them are there for their own reasons, most definitely not just to get back at one particular flats can hero (e.g. Mother Russia, an ex-KGB agent, is there because she is being paid extremely well.)

It is here that the collateral damage begins to make itself apparent.  The Mother-Fucker’s rampage aims precisely to create as much of this, and as unnecessarily cruelly as possible.  For instance, when he targets Katie Deuxma, Kick-Ass’s crush, he doesn’t just take her and initiate a hostage scenario: he kills her parents, and gets his cohorts to take turns gang-raping her, leaving her traumatized.  A further step results in the death of Dave’s father.  The entire group of villains shows up at Dave’s father’s funeral, whereby they proceed to kill everyone present.  Because of this focused, yet indiscriminate violence, the police begins to intervene, as while costumed heroes and villains were leading a war against one another, innocents were, invariably, getting caught in the crossfire.

justice_forever_kick_ass2_3

© comicecke.de

It is established at the beginning of Kick-Ass 2, that the masked heroes of the city have a rapport with law enforcement that they are working in conjunction with the police as opposed to completely outside of them.  However, The Mother-Fucker’s acts of violence make an already shaky partnership begin to collapse, as there is simply no way of distinguishing a hero from a villain on sight.  This runs counter to why the costumes are donned, but makes a good point about the indiscriminate response of law enforcement to such matters.  Law enforcement is based on the premise that the laws, while of course flexible, have to avoid discrimination between races, classes, genders, etc.  But this incident in the comic (and the movie, it seems) also reaffirms the problem posed in the intro: that fringe benefits reaped from vigilantism is all that is keeping some of the heroes (those who can be brought down, the Rule of Cool making this impossible notwithstanding) at large.

It can be said that Kick-Ass, as a two-part series, is prone to its own brand of realism that takes into account small, yet prevalent details, yet, as a movie series, also often decides to challenge itself.

Next on “Superhero vs. Realism: The Ultimate Battle”

We will take a look at the James Gunn flick, “Super” to observe how, when a sense of realism is observed with a little more stability and more emphasis on a different breed of the flat scan hero, a theme that will endure for the remaining two parts: the mentally unsound one.

A look at sex doll industry – what happens before they become “partners”

© Zackary Canepari

One of the strangest and most bizarre places to visit must be a factory where sex dolls are made. Headless bodies, smiling plastic faces, and rows of teeth – it is almost the perfect reflection of what awaits these objects of sexual fantasies in this disturbing reality.

Many men who use sex dolls they become so much more than just dolls – they think of them as their life “partners” which replace real women in their lives. Some men are even married like, for example, Bob Givens, who has the largest collection of such dolls.

The photograph seen here are a part of project called “Love Machines” initiated by Zachary Canepari. He made these photos in California, sex dolls factory called „Abbys Creations“. Each doll costs around 7000 dollars and is customer according to the ordering men wishes. So, they have different body sizes, hair and eye color and so on.

The man in the video is Matt McCullen and he is a sculptor of these dolls. He explains why a certain man from Alaska has ordered the sex doll: “They had to bring this doll out in this large, coffin-like box. But he loved it. He said it really took away the edge off of his loneliness and being alone out there.”

The photos of the sex doll being made practically show a lot more than words could express – a woman in this sex doll world becomes a mere composition of parts and components. And it seems that love has nothing to do with love.

Honey Pie

Honey Pie

Honey Pie

Honey Pie

Honey Pie

© Zackary Canepari

 

After the symbolic attack on Syria – no consequences

© Wikimedia Commons

Why I am saying this? I just simply look at the dynamics of the conflicts in the Middle East. Before the actual military actions begin one must look for the actions the of psychological war. Both enemies and victims are presenting themselves as giants, spitting hellfire and frighten others with apocalypse. The result – „business as usual“.

Who are giants and who are dwarfs in this conflict? Iran, terrorist organizations “Hezbollah” and “Hamas”, “Al-Qaeda”, Syria are dwarfs. Yes, they can get nasty and play dirty but they have no major influence in the West-East conflict.

For example, Iran still knows its place in the world, so it can assume that the possibilities to engage in military action against USA and NATO are down to zero. It is like it was with North Korea: it acted like a drunk for a while and – nothing. “Again” it has won against the West, and “again” it seeks peace with South Korea.

Iran is threatening to start positional-terrorist war with the West but it means nothing. We have to separate interests from threats. And Iran has no threats. So far.

If the West hits Syria symbolically (it seems they talk only about symbolical action), “Hezbollah” would not start attack on Israel.  A few weeks ago a couple of missiles were launched form the northern part of Lebanon, and Israel answered in the same way. How did it end? In silence.

We have to remember what the leader of this terrorist organization said after Second Lebanon war: “If I knew the consequences of Israel attack against us, I would have not started this in the first place”.

This means that no one will start anything now. Because the leaders of Israel always say what would they do to with the enemy and they keep their word. Israel for almost 70 years is in military situation and the enemies were proven that this is true. Otherwise, there would not be Israel.

The talks of Syrian leaders – are kind of the same expressions of psychological war. The nuclear reactors already do not exist after Israel launched an attack in 2007, Syria did not do anything. Anti-missile weapons came to Lebanon – Syria did not do anything. It is safe to assume that Syria will not do anything this time again.

But can we trust the rationality of Syrian dictator Assad? When he will realize that end is near, he will try to make the apocalypse. The time will show. But Syria’s war with Israel would be the last Syria’s war. One lunatic causes the death of thousands. Even if the regime falls, the problems will not be solved in this country. But there will be no apocalypse. The Arab League does not support Assad. And their position is important both to Russia, Iran and “Hezbollah”.

Iran knows that it is not clever to engage in this conflict, Russia knows that it is essential to be friendly with Arabs. Therefore, there will be no World War III because of Syria. This is the psychological war for the hearts and minds. Maybe it is better than the alternative – total chaos.

Those who have power do not bend for provocations. The fact that the range of the attack against Syria is revealed is only to calm Russia down. It is like saying that there is no threat to Russia’s geopolitical interests in this region. Still, Russia has decided to send a couple of ships saying that this was an old-planned mission. If they need a serious conflict – two ships are not enough because Syria is not Cuba. Turkey is also ready to participate in “punishing Syria”. The talks of Russia about the norms of the international law are worth nothing. Russia says it just to say it because it still controls the occupied part of George. Moreover, the fantasies of some Russia political analyst that Russia may occupy the Baltic States are also worth nothing. No attention should be paid because nothing like this will happen. Russia wants other to fear and panic like always.

There are no equals to the NATO in military power sense. The fact is that this power does not threaten Russia or China with military actions. The West fights those two using economic-political measures. The most important thing – the nuclear weapons play deterring part. So the symbolic attack on Syria will have no major consequences and it is going to be a lesson to be learned or not. And that is it. All parts of this conflict will check their positions but the only ones to gain benefit from this are oil and finance speculators. As always.

 

Superhero vs. Reality: The Ultimate Battle (II)

Kick-Ass movie poster © Wikimedia Commons

Dave Lizewski is a typical high school outcast.  He’s a comic book geek, who hangs with a close-knit and small group of likeminded people.  He has a crush on Katie Deuxma, one that he cannot express or hope to have requited.  His comic books provide him with an escape from the grinding tedium of his day-to-day life.  In short, Dave Lizewski is Peter Parker, without the photographic talent and interest in science.

PART TWO: KICK-ASS

One day, a discussion with his friends regarding the absence of costumed superheroes in real life, Dave arrives at an idea.  He promptly purchases and modifies a green bodysuit with yellow accents, complete with mask.  He wraps duct tape around a pair of batons and carries them on his back via a harness.  Filled with conviction, he observes, at first.  At a certain point, of course, Dave decides to intervene.  The result is worlds away from what he has expected however: without much of a fight, Dave gets stabbed.  He blindly stumbles onto the road and becomes a victim of a hit-and-run.  When he recovers, he has several metal plates embedded into his body, and extremely reduced pain response due to nerve damage, what he calls “a slightly elevated capacity to take a kicking.” This leads Dave to undertake his first successful act of crime-fighting, all before the watchful eyes and camera phones of bystanders.  Upon being asked his name in the immediate aftermath, Dave identifies himself as “Kick-Ass.”

While this is going on, Damon Mcready, ex-cop and his 11-year-old daughter, Mindy Mcready are training to take on Frank D’Amico, a powerful mob boss in New York, to get revenge for the death of Mindy’s mother and Damon’s wife.  Ruthlessly effective, merciless, well-trained and well-equipped, the dynamic duo is the epitome of a tight-knit operation.  Upon a chance encounter with Kick-Ass, they seek to recruit him.  Meanwhile, D’Amico himself has gotten wind of Kick-Ass’s activities, which leads his son, Chris, to don the guise of Red Mist, a second, albeit richer amateur superhero, to lure Kick-Ass into a trap, in due time.  However, D’Amico discovering Big Daddy and Hit Girl’s existence, manages to lure ‘them’ into a trap, along with Kick-Ass, during which, Big Daddy is killed.

Kick-Ass and Hit Girl thus undertake a raid on D’Amico’s home, cutting a swath through his security, and while Hit Girl takes on D’Amico, Kick-Ass has a one-on-one with Red Mist.  Kick-Ass and Hit Girl triumph, with Kick-Ass taking D’Amico out with a rocket launcher, and the story seems to end on a bittersweet note of normal life resuming – albeit with more and more amateur superheroes coming out into the world.

kick-ass1

A still from Kick-Ass © dorkshelf.com

Reality is Suspect

Kick-Ass touches upon the core elements of a flat scan would-be superhero.  The first among these is limitations, and/or shortness of a Rule of Cool-based nigh-omnipotence.  Dave assumes that he is in possession of this, seemingly unaware that most characters have contractual immortality (thanks to the comics being titled after characters, not anything else and “The Death and Return of Superman” storyline.) Even in the scenes that he is shown to be practicing for actual action, he believes he will be able to exist as heroes do in comic book panels.  However, in a Superhero versus Reality situation, reality is quickly overwhelms the fiction: Dave learns quickly that sheer determination cannot stop a knife from sliding in between his ribs.  He ups his arsenal in light of this event, but his upgrade consists of “the gayest looking she’s (Hit Girl’s) ever seen.” Sensible, effective to a point, but still not good enough when faced with the kinds of adversaries Dave was setting himself up to face.

Therein lays the second layer of limitations.  Dave is a high school student getting by on pocket money, his perception of an actual fight is to either be on the receiving end or from comic books.  He has no knowledge of martial arts, or even basic street fighting.  He’s not exceptionally strong (to his credit, he tries to rectify this somewhat, having the sense to maintain that his thin fame would break easily) and/or has any athletic ability.  He is a normal human being whose idea of an altercation is something he doesn’t take part in.  By contrast, Big Daddy and Hit Girl are the polar opposite.  They have martial arts training, they are armed to the teeth (with actual firearms, knives, the works) they wear, inasmuch as it counts, armor that actually might stop a knife or a bullet: one of the famous scenes of the movie is when Big Daddy is teaching Hit Girl to take a bullet to her bulletproof vest – by shooting her at more or less point-blank range.  But Big Daddy is an ex-cop, who has had experience in the matter, and Hit Girl is a well-trained assassin (who reminds me of Damian Wayne, actually.) This is why that Kick-Ass’s first stint results in a failure that almost costs him his life: he’s not prepared, he’s not ready.  In fact, even when he is, he is shown to largely get by with Hit Girl doing the heavy lifting.

1351721-kick_ass26

A still from Kick-Ass © giantbomb.com

Identity Crisis

Like almost all superheroes, Dave maintains a secret identity.  He comments on how having this secret, unlike his comic book counterparts, is actually exciting – nobody knows.  As it has been the case with many superheroes, he finds his alter ego, Kick-Ass, empowering.  This is a common theme in heroes with tragic origin stories (Peter Parker and Batman being two prime examples) because it relies upon a person attempting to seize control and ease the everyday chaos of their civilian lives.  Whereas Peter Parker armed himself with an unwavering sense of responsibility due to having his powers, Dave simply does it to counteract his low standing in the world.  However, the movie makes a subtle, but good case for amateurism of such an undertaking by a high school student: after Kick-Ass becomes a YouTube sensation, Dave sets up a myspace page for Kick-Ass, from his home computer, which is how Big Daddy locates him.

“With great power, comes great responsibility,” was Ben Parker’s motto, one that stuck with Peter, because he did not grasp what he had the potential of doing beyond self-aggrandizement.  While preparing for the final push, Dave comments that “with no power, comes no responsibility” but states that he did not completely grasp what he was implying when he set out to be Kick-Ass.  These points towards another aspect of the superhero mentioned: a responsibility towards those unable to, or unwilling to step up.  Whereas a regular superhero’s responsibility, as mentioned, comes from power, in the absence of it, one can expect the same thing from a hero’s convictions.  Dave, initially attempting to escape the confines of his life, discovers in his exploits that he is willing to step up to the plate, in fact, he’s more than willing – he’s one of the only two.

The movie is adamant about this particular part: that even nut jobs in weird costumes can make a difference, precisely because a hero isn’t one because of any special abilities, but instead, is one that is willing to take it upon him to right what he has observed to be wrong.  While this’ll be a bit of a hyperbole, this can be seen in the Superman/Batman dichotomy.  The former is given his powers and was raised to feel a certain responsibility towards those he is, arguably, superior to.  The latter, despite his admitted genius, is a flat scan, whose parents were killed in front of him, which led him to take up the cape and cowl, because he felt the need to do something about it.  To this respect, Hit-Girl is Batman; Kick-Ass begins as the caricatured version of Booster Gold, after a fashion, but gradually learns that it is the will to act that makes a hero, not the ability to fly.

Disbelief Unsuspended

Kick-Ass is a bit of honest speculation; however, the movie experiences a break from its own realism at a certain point and initiates a reconstruction of every element that it had thus far attempted to deconstruct.  Kick-Ass appears in the final charge against D’Amico with a jetpack, armed with dual barrels on both sides.  While some such breaks (such as Dave’s metal plates rendering him more or less impervious to pain) are acceptable, as per the Willing Suspension of Disbelief, that particular appearance breaks it.  The movie slips from being a more than semi-realistic take on the concept of amateur vigilantes to a comic book adaptation: which is an interesting irony, since the actual comic that Kick-Ass was based on has Kick-Ass and Hit Girl almost dying at the hands of Frank D’Amico.

As such, while a well-meaning venture, Kick-Ass does its realism halfway, but is still an interesting take on the subject.

Superhero versus Reality: The Ultimate Battle (I)

Promotional art for Superman vol. 2, #204 (April 2004) by Jim Lee and Scott Williams © Wikimedia Commons

Mitchell Siegel was a sign painter.  His life was cut short by someone robbing his store – he died of a heart attack during.  His family was devastated, but none more took it to heart than his son, Jerry.  Jerry Siegel, a fan of comic strips and sci-fi pulp, would years later co-create what he probably did not assume to carry such iconic potential.

PART ONE: ORIGINS

What Jerry Siegel created was Superman, the first and arguably the epitomic superhero who was “faster than a speeding bullet.” He wore a red and blue costume, with a big “S” logo on his chest.  He was super-strong, had intense heat-vision, freezing breath, could fly and was virtually invulnerable (to all but one thing.)  But Superman wasn’t just a larger-than-life superhuman, never mind the fact that he wasn’t human, period, but humanoid.  He was from Krypton, a distant planet; when the planet was destroyed, he was sent into space by his father in hopes that he would survive, and the shuttle ended up in Kent farm in Kansas, Smallville.  It became quickly apparent that the radiation of our solar system’s red sun gave him his abilities.  His one weakness, thus, was any type of fragment left of Krypton (“kryptonite”) which deprived him of his powers and incapacitated him.

He also existed with normal humans, moonlighting as Clark Kent, investigative journalist which allowed him to get wind of disasters as they happened.  His adoptive parents, the Kents, raise him to be an exemplary human being, perhaps more so since he was not human to begin with.  He was instilled with a sense of right and wrong, which guides, for the most part, his actions as Superman.  He maintained a double life: crushing on Lois Lane as Clark Kent and defending Metropolis (and on some occasions the entire universe) from imminent threats.  His life as Superman invariably complicated his life as Clark Kent, especially since Lois Lane, whom he had a crush on, was more interested in Superman.

As per his position, his foes were also numerous, the most prominent among them being the evil super-genius Lex Luthor.  Among others were the Kryptonian General Zod, Darkseid the Lord of Apokalips, or the space-biker Lobo.  Each villain had their own ends, often challenging and sometimes coming very close to actually defeating Superman.  Their efforts would often concentrate on the civilian populace, themselves lacking in terms of any special ability that would benefit them in a situation like this, and thus depended on Superman to help them.

Deathofsuperman

Superman dies © Wikimedia Commons

Of course, sometimes, Superman, being inhuman yet still far from perfect, either makes mistakes or simply cannot tip the scales.  These moments bring forth the danger inherent to what Superman is: a vigilante.  Vigilantism is illegal due to its inner contradiction: the vigilante would have to operate outside of the law to protect the law.  Superman enjoys being a Kryptonian and an invaluable asset to the planet due to his powers, but others are not so lucky.

The Mark of a Hero

Superman’s case forms pretty much the basis of later superheroes, with the exclusion of some of course, and as such, these heroes share many of his characteristics.  Firstly, most heroes have unusual and practical abilities that separate them from the baseline human (“flatscan.”) To elaborate: the Flash is a speedster, gifted with superspeed; the Green Lanterns wear power rings (the first Green Lantern had an actual railroad lantern); Spider-Man has agility, ability to cling to surfaces, proportionately raised strength, and spider-sense that alerts him to danger; Daredevil is blind, but his other senses are extremely heightened and his hearing works basically like sonar.  The most notable non-powered superhero is Batman, but it might be argued that his sheer obsessive, psychopathic fixation on his crusade is a superpower in and of itself.

Green_Lantern_Rebirth_6

Green Lantern © Wikimedia Commons

Secondly, their abilities were almost invariably thrust upon them, either by way of birth or circumstance, mostly the latter.  Jay Garrick is exposed to heavy water, Hal Jordan coincides with the ring, Peter Parker is bitten (somewhat randomly) by a radioactive spider.  What makes them heroes is determined by how they choose to employ these abilities, and therein is the third mark of a superhero: conviction and motivation.  Superheroes are motivated primarily by a disgust towards evil in all its recognizable forms, a concept of justice and a sense of responsibility to the world around them, because they have more to give than a flatscan, and as such, they must.

Thirdly, most all heroes maintain double lives, secret identities.  Primarily, this is to keep their loved ones out of the crossfire, and to not give their enemies a way to hurt them through others.  A second reason is a question of, interestingly, identity: with the exception of Superman and the mental exception of Batman, the superheroes’ identity begins when the costume is worn, and ends when it is discarded.  Of course, there is often interplay between the two identities, and it is often commented that it is impossible to separate them.

Fourth and final, in attempt to actually exist as two different personalities, and to conceal who they are while reinforcing who they are in that moment, heroes wear costumes, often with masks.  Colourful and often utilizing symbols that pertain to the “heroic” identity, the costumes mark the identity of a hero.  Their superhero names (Batman, Daredevil, Booster Gold) that are coupled with recognizable, distinctive visuals do not symbolize but rather fully personalize the heroes themselves.

Reality Bites

However, reality, or a more realistic framework would almost completely erase the above.  For points in comparison, I will utilize the non super-powered hero, Batman, who is able to do more than just handle a bunch of gang members, and fight crime on a (mostly) nightly basis, having no superpowers but instead just a very large amount of money and handy gadgets?

First and foremost, Batman’s existence is backed by a suspension of disbelief, which goes hand-in-hand with the Rule of Cool.  The Rule of Cool, courtesy of TvTropes.org, states that “the limit of the willing suspension of disbelief for a given element is directly proportionate to the element’s awesomeness.” Which means, if a given hero was set up to be able to lift a tank with one hand and use it to smash other tanks nearby, questions such as how he was able to even hold the tank properly in the first place are discarded because it looks good.  As such, Batman entering a crowded bar of outlaw bikers and taking each and every one of them down without a scratch on him falls into Rule of Cool – it isn’t questioned.  Unfortunately, reality lacks such a safety mechanism and as such, limits, quite severely, what an ordinary human can do even with the best of odds.

Batman_Lee

Batman © Wikimedia Commons

Second, and in conjunction with the first, Batman’s Rule-of-Cool ability to come out on top of everyday encounters being non-existent also means that there is a greater chance for flatscans to fail to do so.  This comes in two shapes: weapons and number of opponents.  The most prevalent weapons of criminals, especially in the USA, are guns and knives – both built with the explicit intention to be deadly with one precise strike, against which defensive means (such as Kevlar) is possible, but not ultimate.  Disarming the aggressor isn’t a very viable option, either, especially since it is a slim chance that there will be one assailant present, and no matter how efficient, or fast a human being can be, the bar is set very low as to what one person can do against an armed group of ten.

A third problem is that, Rule-of-Cool heroes are recognize as necessary concessions that are still watched pretty closely due to the danger they present, as they are allowed to operate outside of the wall.  Batman’s main problem with Gotham PD is usually the sheer amount of police officers who argue that he is, in essence, a criminal himself.  A beneficial criminal, but a criminal still.  Real-life law enforcement is based on something known as the monopoly of the use of violence, which grants legal rights to use violence to two primary institutions: the military and the police.  Anyone doing so who does not belong to either, who does it to enforce the law, is considered a vigilante, which is precisely what a superhero is.

The Fiction

This introduction forms the backdrop of three movies that will be examined.  The three were chosen to their willingness to examine, to varying degrees, the real-life implications of a flatscan attempting to be a costumed vigilante.  This four-part series does, necessarily, ignore the actual real-life costumed vigilantism that does take place in at least some parts of the USA, but even those instances bear close resemblance to the ideas presented.  The movies examined will be: “Kick-Ass” (with a commentary on its sequel that will be based on the central tenets of Kick-Ass 2, the comic book), “Super.” and “Defendor.” Two movies excluded were “Mystery Men” which exists in too fictional a universe to qualify, and “Special” because I just couldn’t watch it for one reason or another.

To be continued…

Advertisement: http://www.geotermija.lt/oro-kondicionieriai

Artist’s Intent vs. Audience Perception: Counter-Culture’s Devolution into Sub-Culture

Any work of art will, inevitably, place itself squarely on the great divide between the artist’s actual intents, influences and thoughts and what the audience perceives these to be like.  The subjectivity of art stems from this divide.

Some look at the Mona Lisa, for instance, and see a woman smiling.  Some see a centuries-long conspiracy.  Some don’t get what the fuss is about.  Neither of these viewpoints are falsifiable, simply because they are opinions based around an object left open to interpretation.

It is precisely this reason (openness to different viewpoints) is that counter-cultures, no matter what they are or what they contain, tend to devolve into sub-cultures over time.  The process, outlined in numerous sources, is simple: the movement is pioneered by individuals who have an as-of-then “different” manner of doing things.  It could be working-class frustration let out on stage over three-chord songs like punk, or seeking a more melancholy aesthetic like Goth  Likeminded individuals will inevitably meet, exchange notes, push the envelope of what they perceive to be their own context.

It is at this point, where the pioneers inevitably garner attention that they push the first domino.  As the amount of people subscribing to what is displayed, in one way or another, the context itself starts to become distinctive.  Traits common to those existing within the counter-culture begin to emerge, and begin to spread.  Individuality is downgraded to individuality-in-context, identity begins to define groups instead of singular entities, quirks and deviations become norms and standards.  What once was strange and unusual thus becomes familiar and, more importantly, adoptable.  Adoptability breeds accessibility, and where something is accessible, a market for it grows, sealing the fate of what once was an outlier by forcibly dragging it into the standard distribution.

The existence of so many clothing brands belonging to the counter-culture to end all counter-cultures, punk, is a testament to how much of a gross subversion this last step becomes: for a movement that was based fundamentally on a DIY (Do-It-Yourself) mindset, a clothing line is the exact opposite of what it is supposedly based on.  We might turn to the 1979 Bauhaus single, “Bela Lugosi’s Dead.” Now, it is considered to be an anthem of gothic subculture.  What is lesser known, however, is that Bauhaus wrote the song to poke fun at the “gothic” crowd that appeared to not only subscribe to the supposed “requirements” of the subculture, but almost enforced it as well.  A song meant to be satirical was understood as descriptive, which is basically how the process works.

At this point, I would like to turn to a more popular example to demonstrate how audience perceptions can often run counter to the artist’s intent.  None more poignant in this regard than the work of the iconoclastic Jhonen Vasquez.

Johnny the Homicidal Maniac

His second most famous work, Johnny the Homicidal Maniac (henceforth JtHM) was a limited series comic, published initially as single issues (seven in total) between 1995 and 1997.  It was, at the time, a unique body of work.  Featuring a unique, black-and-white art style (with individual panels drawn as if they were being pictured by a camera), a distinctive narrative that’s equal parts raving insanity and actual existential angst, a plethora of in-jokes and a loose fourth wall (Vasquez often comments on a particular panel, or scribbles notes regarding a scene) JtHM was in a genre all unto its own.  The comic often featured “Meanwhiles,” aside stories that, apart from one, have no bearing to the plot; it was also interrupted by single-page, nonsensical Happy Noodle Boy comics featuring a stick figure shouting random obscenities, as well as the adventures of Wobbly-Headed Bob, an existential nihilist that would make Nietzche believe he was on happy pills.

johny the homicidal maniac

The Front Cover of Johnny the Homicidal Maniac #1 © Wikimedia Commons

Plot-wise, the comic consisted of Johnny C., a serial killer, whom had to kill people mainly to paint a wall in his house with blood, because if he didn’t, something from “the other side” would get through.  Of course, as per the title, Johnny was portrayed as an unstable, though extremely contemplative individual to whom the act of murder is basically like brushing his teeth.  Case in point: a scene in the comic involves Johnny slaughtering an entire fast food place (going so far as to kill the cockroaches in the kitchen as well) because an elderly woman called him “wacky.” It branches out from there into details, such as how Johnny can keep killing people without getting caught, or the emergence of his “admirer.”

The comic’s main staple, however, was that Johnny served as ½ of a mouthpiece for Jhonen Vasquez in expressing open disdain towards those that would abuse others simply because they look different and are inclined to different things, mainly playing off on the jocks vs. Goths framework.  The second half is a distributed mouthpiece that exists mostly in the supporting cast, and is used to express the same amount and kind of disdain for the excesses, self-indulgence and iniquitousness of the gothic subculture.  The embodiment of his was Anne Gwish (read “anguish”,) an aside character inhabiting the same universe as Johnny, who was meant to be the epitome of the gothic stereotype.  Smoking clove cigarettes, dressed entirely in black, a fan of “Pitchspade Symphony” (Switchblade Symphony that was considered a landmark in American gothic music, a point I plan to debate elsewhere) bitter, cynical, yet shallow and a bit too preoccupied with the shortcomings of other people around her, Anne Gwish is Jhonen Vasquez’s message: “I hate you all.”

Perhaps what’s emergent through these descriptions is that JtHM, perhaps unlike Serena Valentino’s GloomCookie (which itself existed inside, but separated the goods from the evils of the said subculture), strived to not only exist outside the gothic subculture, and even actively and clearly showed an opposition to it.  Today, Johnny the Homicidal Maniac and it’s various merchandise can be found in every Hot Topic.  The gothic subculture pretty much adopted the comic as its own (something Vasquez had prophesized by putting a “Johnny the Hamicidal Maniac” poster on Anne Gwish’s wall) and chose to make it one of the landmark masterpieces of gothic comics – the exact opposite of what it was meant to be.

Fillerbunny

Fillerbunny was initially conceived as a cute bunny that inhabited single pages that would normally house adverts, therefore acting as “filler.”  Jhonen Vasquez then saw fit to undertake an experiment and proceeded to write and illustrate 15 pages’ worth of material as he did all the other Fillerbunny pages: at the last possible second.  Drawn in one night, the first Fillerbunny “book,” titled I Fill Up 15 Pages! Had the eponymous bunny at odds with an unseen, controlling force (presumed to be Vasquez, who appears in panels ranting about his inability to finish the book on time) that wants the bunny to entertain the readers.  When the bunny declines, he (or she) is forced to do so, sometimes at gunpoint.  It quickly becomes apparent that Fillerbunny only desires to die, for it cannot bear the weight of 15 consecutive pages.

staringcontest

Fillerbunny © webspace.webring.com

The book was, strangely, a success.  It was just an experiment on par with the “Bad Art Collection” featuring inconsistent style (at one point devolving into mere scribbles,) zero continuity, little more than a bunny being subjected to strange methods of torture, and Jhonen Vasquez’s badly-drawn self-complaining about how his hand keept morphing into a “pickly-schlong thing.” Perhaps a rather extreme experiment, the book was wildly embraced by his readership, who seemed to harbor a belief that the work was nothing short of genius, when Vasquez himself was repeatedly quoted as saying it was just a book he draw in a single night with the intent to fill 15 pages, nothing further.

Invader Zim

Invader Zim (henceforth IZ) is perhaps the most misunderstood work by Jhonen Vasquez by far, as it was even misunderstood by its home studio, Nickolodeon.  IZ is currently still a pop-culture phenomenon, a modern visual media Chernobyl that got misconstrued due to its high-tempo action and “Vasquezian” sense of humor.

To briefly comment: Zim is an Irken, an alien race that values universal conquest and snacks equally.  Initially the reason why the firsts universal conquest operation failed, he forces his way into the assigning of tasks before the second attempt.  Invaders’ work consist of blending in with their assigned planet, assessing its weaknesses and preparing it for invasion.  Desperate to get rid of him, the Almighty Tallest (as height is rank in Irken society) give him a dysfunctional robot assistant (GIR, a scrapped unit put together on the spot) and send him off into space, hoping he will die on the way.  Zim, however, accidentally makes it to planet Earth, settles in, and proceeds to gather information by attending school, where he meets Dib, a would-be paranormal investigator whom instantly recognizes him as an alien (Zim’s disguise being a wig and contact lens eyes doesn’t help.)

The show consisted mainly of Zim’s ill-thought out attempts to conquer Earth, Dib’s struggle to expose him as an alien and to stop his schemes, intercut with the raving insanity of GIR (Rosarik Rikki Simmons, the voice actor for GIR, once commented that he was being paid to spout nonsense in a studio,) coupled with top-notch animation, intriguing concepts and plots, numerous in-jokes and almost hyperactive pace made it an instant hit.  I myself was initiated by my sister, also familiar with Vasquez’s work and it didn’t take long before our father was in the fold.

Invader-Zim-invader-zim-23402012-500-375

Invader Zim © Fanpop.com

Therein lies the first misconception on Nickolodeon’s part: although they had planned for IZ to be marketed to a slightly older than their 2-11 year-old demographic, they still accepted it to be watched mainly by teenagers to tweenagers.  The problem with this was that IZ took its cues from science fiction, sci-fi and regular horror, alien invasion, cyberpunk genres of fiction and the aforementioned Vasquezian disdain for society in general.  Scenes of torture and pain inflicted, mutations, open displays of parental neglect and the abuse of children through the school system were not exceptions: they were the rules.

Case-in-point: “Best Friend.” Zim, upon hearing comments that he is friendless and therefore “weird,” fears being exposed as an alien.  Thus he holds an audition for three “friend candidates” consisting of an absorbency test (pressing their heads against spilt milk), an electrical conductivity test (basically giving them electricity through two conductor rods) and a final test (consisting of a toy car and a squirrel, unseen.) The chosen friend, Keef, quickly takes his “friendship” to stalker territory: he constantly walks around Zim’s house, turns up in it, refuses to leave Zim alone.  Zim finds the solution in luring Keef into his house once again, whereby he plucks out Keef’s eyes and replaces them with hypnotic, cybernetic implants that will make Keef think the first thing he sees when opening them (a squirrel) is Zim, hence locking the desperate boy into an unending series of hallucinations whereby he chases squirrels all day, wondering why they won’t talk to him.  And it’s played for laughs.

wallpaper_zimcontrols_1024

Invader Zim © roomwithamoose.com

As demonstrated, Nickolodeon’s error was not being able to anticipate how much older their “targeted older demographic” would be.  The humor intercutting the nightmarish sequences and concepts that turn incredibly chilling when given a moment’s thought was simply there because Vasquez has always enjoyed random, almost spasmodic bursts of humor amidst even the most serious situation.  As such, young adults and actual adults were the main demographic of IZ, leaving Nickolodeon’s hands largely empty where its core demographic was concerned – their misjudgment came from the fact that they did not anticipate just how far over the heads of their intended audience IZ would fly.

Unfortunately, theirs was not the only error.  Recently (2012) Vasquez has gone on the record to say that IZ was being watched “wrong” as he frequently heard the audience giving pitying “awwws” to snippets of unmade episode scripts.  He went on to say that he was shocked at the reaction, because the body of work was basically sci-fi horror, and nothing in it was intended to elicit that particular reaction.  He has also, previously, expressed disdain towards the extreme amount of cuteness assigned to GIR, whom he portrays as a dangerously unstable robot armed to the teeth with various weapons (lasers, missiles, guns, etc.) who fails to grasp the implications of any action and is quite easily distracted.  Further, GIR was subtly portrayed as harboring suicidal tendencies (expressing that he wanted to die at least twice), as well as (due to being put together from trash) experiencing hallucinations frequently: one instance of this had the cows he was looking at morph into sausages with top hats and canes, who chanted “Dance with us, GIR! Dance with us into oblivion!”

This misperception, after IZ’s cancellation, led to a phenomenon not unlike the above abstract – GIR’s perceived cuteness led to franchising focus almost exclusively on him, even though he was a supporting character.  The culture of “cute” is an entirely different subject, one that was taken to its logical extreme in Japan decades ago, but the main perception remains globally that what is cute, is for children, and hence should be endorsed.  This opened IZ to an audience closer in terms of age average to the one Nickolodeon originally intended, but by doing so, it shifted focus from elusive content to recognizable elements, therefore being made adoptable by hollowing out the larger scheme.

The Vasquezian Connection

The three examples given connect sublimely, as each one exemplifies a body of work that has an entirely different intent than the one the audience perceived, as well as the realm in which the body of work existed.  Johnny the Homicidal Maniac wasn’t a goth comic, Fillerbunny wasn’t (and with its three books, still isn’t) a comic, period, and Invader Zim is not by any means children’s entertainment full of cute characters.  In a way, these mark different Bela Lugosi’s Deads, their points being lost in the shuffle of growing attention to them.  Of course, it must be mentioned that Jhonen Vasquez himself is an example to this phenomenon: going from an elusive, underground, inconoclastic cult figure to the accessible, almost chipper individual who has become the staples of various ‘cons.  But individual devolution, in his case, is even more difficult and would warrant its own article.

Breketai Šiauliai

Russian army choir sings James Bond “Skyfall”

© youtube.com

The Russian Army choir surprised the world this week on St Petersburg television when they sang the famous James Bond movie song “Skyfall” originally performed by Adele.

A seven man group sang Adele’s famous song which in fact has won Oscar surprisingly well  on a breakfast television show on the city’s Channel 5. Let’s be honest, you would not have thought this will ever happen – Russian army choir singing one of the world’s most famous spy movies theme song!

Russia’s military choir was founded in 1928 and is well known for performing military classics like Katjusha, which tells the story of a  wife yearning for her husband at the front. But this choir also has a proud tradition of making cover versions of popular songs. They have performed Sweet Home Alabama and made Men at Work’s Land Down Under as a Russian folk song in the past.

Kabinos

Dear Prime Minister Cameron

© Wikimedia Commons

We know that you will agree that one of the hallmarks of free and open democracies is a vivid public debate addressing all fundamental aspects of society, including the balance and possible conflict between the legitimate security concerns of governments and the protection of privacy and the free press.

We all understand both the imperative to uphold domestic security and the equally important imperative to protect our open public debate about the limits to and legal implications of these efforts.

The debate is not a sign of weakness of our democracies. It is the basis of our strength.

On this backdrop, events in Great Britain over the past week gives rise to deep concern. We may differ on where to draw the lines and strike the right balance, but we should not differ in our determination to protect an open debate about these essential questions. Also we should stand united to protect individuals engaging in such debates within the parameters of democracy and the rule of law.

The free press plays a crucial role in this regard, also in situations where information revealed by the press is most inconvenient to governments and the intelligence community. We are surprised by the recent acts by officials of your government against our colleagues at The Guardian and deeply concerned that a stout defender of democracy and free debate like The United Kingdom refers anti terror legislation in order to legalize what amounts to harassment of both the paper and individuals associated with it. Moreover, it is deeply disturbing that the police have now announced a criminal investigation. We hope this is not to be seen as a step against journalists doing journalism.

The implication of these acts may have ramifications far beyond the boarders of the UK, undermining the position of the free press throughout the world.

Mr. Prime Minister, we hope that you will soon act to rectify this and reinstall your government among the leading defenders of the free press and an open debate in accordance with the proud tradition of your country.

Hilde Haugsgjerd, Editor-in-chief Aftenposten, 
Peter Wolodarski, Editor-in-chief Dagens Nyheter, 
Riikka Venäläinen, Editor-in-chief Helsingin Sanomat, 
Bo Lidegaard, Editor-in-chief Politiken.

IRV skrajutės

Reporter was kicked off the air of Russian TV when he spoke of gay rights

© youtube.com

Reporter James Kirchick was kicked off the air of Russian TV Wednesday after he refused to talk about Bradley Manning and instead spoke about the Russian government’s anti-gay laws.

“Being here on a Kremlin-funded propaganda network, I’m going to wear my gay pride suspenders and speak out against the horrific, anti-gay legislation that Vladimir Putin has signed into law,” Kirchick said.

RT is funded by the Russian government, which recently passed a sweeping law that bans the public discussion of gay rights and relationships in the presence of children.

As Kirchick continued to speak about the laws and the government’s funding of the network, one RT host insisted to Kirchick, “You have to come over here and see for yourself.”

“You have 24 hours a day to lie about America, I am going to tell the truth with my two minutes,” Kirkchick went on to say after RT hosts tried to cut him off.

TOP 10 most scandalous movies

The People vs. Larry Flynt movie poster

From time to time someone makes a movie which shocks the wider audience and, therefore, is widely discussed or sometimes even banned.

Human nature is like that: if you are told not to watch something, you will definately try to watch it. It is the same with scandalous movies. Their creators and movies are heavily criticized and still get lots of attention. People are inevitably drawn to them.

1. JFK (1991)

Oliver Stone was practically buried under the critique he received after this movie hit the big screens. The USA media attacked Stone without mercy. CBS, The New York Times, Time, Newsweek and The Washington Post criticized him for hypothetical thoughts that are presented as facts in the movie and the way he creates provocative and crazy conspiracy theory. It is not surprising that JFK received so much dissatisfaction. It shows unbelievable corruption and lies which kill the American Dream and the truth is buried somewhere beyond human reach.  Someone says in the movie: “It is hard to believe that this is happening in our country”. Neither in the movie, nor the real life people want to believe such things, therefore, everyone feels confused when faced with controversial assumptions.

Movies based on true events usually are very popular, so it is not surprising that the story about the death of John Kenedy made such a fuss. The most important question in the movie is „who killed the president?“ and searching for an answer is covered with conspiracy shocking theories.

2. Apocalypse Now (1979)

Movies about war are not that rare but this one received unprecendented attention especially because HOW it showed war. Usually soldiers are portrayed as being brave and ready to sacrifise everything for their homeland. However, soldiers in Apocalypse Now are scared, crazy and have no idea what they are doing. They are on missions which are non-existent and feel the need to be Gods.

Apocalypse Now, like other films about war, shows how pointless military conflicts are, however, in this case it is more like a background to illustrate the (un)readiness of the soldiers. The task seems simple – to find and kill the rebel (which gone a little crazy since during Vietnam War) and at the same time to obey law as much as possible. Not to totally disobey but to obey as much as possible but how to decide what is enough of obeying in this case? When does the wish to be the God get more important than justice?

Such non-stereotypical portraits of soldiers of course was greeted with certain degree of suspicion. Everyone would like to think that military men just wear uniforms and know the right thing to do. However, the soldiers who may not exactly represent this vision made the audiences uncomfortable.


3. Brokeback Mountain (2005)

This movie does not go well together with homophobia. The reactions after the film was screened were mixed from surprised that someone dared to show relationship between two men to banning the movie in some countries. However, not everyone reacted like that and Brokeback Mountain was a major success both critically and commercially.

Two cowboys get lost in mysterious attraction. It is not that comfortable to watch how their relation unravels but it is not harming. It is eye-opening..

Conservative and religious people were definately not happy about this film because they believe it was homosexual propaganda. Maybe the creators were expecting such reactions because it was practically the first movie showing homosexual love story for the wider audiences for the first time.

4. 9 songs (2004)

9 songs kind of reminds of a porno. It was not regarded as the prono movie probably only because of its soundtrack. The scenes are highly erotic and most would say that almost or definately pornographic.

Because of its erotic content 9 songs was depicted as scandalous and outragous movie from the beginning. Some said that it is even the propaganda of porn industry. This is only because all the sex scenes were real and to make matters even more shocking – there are plenty of them and they are different (according to one‘s taste, so to speak) from usual intercourse to sensual experiments.

Is it the miracle of cinematography or simply porn movie? Everyone will find their own answer.

5. The Crime of Father Amaro (2002)

First of all, this movie made the religious people angry. A priest, a teenager, sex, pregnancy, abortion. These words should not even appear in the same sentence and yet someone managed to put everything in one movie.

24 year old priest is sent to help an another old priest in a small village in Mexico where he meets a young teenage girl which finds herself immediately attracted to the newly arrived man. They soon start an affair and only the walls of the church keep their secret safe.

It is not the end of the world but the Mexican Church reacted like it was. They demanded to ban this movie and even threatened to excommunicate the actors! All their discontent resulted in making the film even more popular and profitable.

6. Irréversible (2002)

This movie was maybe the most discussed in the recent decade both by critics and cinema lovers and opinions are very diverse. It probably disgusted 90% of all viewers. Brutality, violence and sexual abuse – it is not easy to like this film but it is not easy to hate either. It has well-written scenario, acting is great and directing is original but at the same time it shocks with its cruel and brutal scenes.

The scandalous rape scene in the tunnel seems to cross the line. Any rape scene leaves an unpleasant feeling but this one makes you sick. Anyway, this movie belongs to the category of the brilliant ones because you will remember it for a long time either for its greatness or its violent content.

7. Hard Candy (2005)

This sensitive topic was touched accordingly but it still surprised the audiences. Pedophilia and revenge. Tension and fear. 14-year old “Lolita” meets 32-year old successful photographer on the Internet. He invites her over and when she suspects that he is a pedophile she decides to confront him and reveal his secret.

It seems like she succeeds and comes closer to her objective. The only thing you can think about is “how is it going to end?”. It is worth mentioning that the actors did the great job. When you see the faces of Patrick Wilson and Elen Page in other movies, you will remember Hard Candy.  They make this movie worth watching and pleasurable despite not that pleasant topic.

8. Antichrist (2009)

One can say that this movie is a provocation and not be mistaken. It is the main purpose of Antichrist. Open and shocking scenes, emotional drama, darkness and the whole movie is like that – there is no relief for your eyes, no escape, no light. Most people would not find this movie that disgusting but still it caused some controversy.

A wife and husband lose their only child and decide to try to find peace in small distant house. It sounds like a good idea except that their way of dealing with the loss is everything but normal – lots of sex, violent sex. Those open sex scenes were supposed to shock the viewer. While the goal was reached, many still missed the good scenario.

9.  Requiem for a Dream (2000)

Thrilling, involving, touching movie. It is a masterpiece of directing and screen writing, and the soundtrack plays in your head long after the film is over. This movie about addiction can easily become the addiction itself. You will definitely want to watch it again.

You will see four people’s lives shown simultaneously:  a lonely, television-obsessed woman Sarah, her son Harry and his friends Marion and Tyrone lose themselves to dangerous addictions. Sarah starts to take dieting pills after she finds out that she will be participating in the TV show. At the same time Harry and his friends use cocaine and heroin. While at first the addiction is perceived to help them with their lives, soon they start to lose everything even themselves. Some argued that this film encourages young people to try dangerous drugs but it is doubtful after you see the shocking end of this brilliant film.

 10. The People vs. Larry Flynt (1996)

This is a story about a scandalous USA porno magazine editor Larry Flint. Director Molos Forman managed to turn the scandal into the discussion about press freedom.

Larry Flint – the hero of sexual revolution, drugs and cultural cataclysms. He saw what people needed and had enough courage to start something unimaginable. Larry started something that divided society for a long time – he published the pornographic magazine “Hustler” which of course was not only the magazine. It was the challenge for the society and society decided to punish Larry.

This story may insult those who did not understand the director’s wish to ironically show the American Dream. The language and people are naked in it but it actually helps to make the story better. If you still feel uncomfortable, this movie is just not for you.

El-P: Wolf in a Shearling

© bluefat.com

Exceptions to the mainstream are prevalent, no matter how hard we want to ignore that fact, but an oft-missed question is, what about the outliers? Those so outside the normal distribution of genre inclinations that they are not only unique, but exist in genres all unto their own, while still exhibiting some characteristics of a central genre.

Alternative hip-hop is one such category.  It takes the basic elements of rap music (rhymes, flow, wordplay, beat-driven, home to alter-egos) and all but discards everything else in favor of individual expression and experimentation.  The layman’s understanding of what rap is means nothing in the world of alternative hip-hop.  Here, there are no rules, there are no set topics or song types.  Lyricism is at dead center, but lyrics often branch out into the metaphorical and can require more than a customary listen to decipher, or else they branch into areas mainstream and extension forms of hip-hop do not extend to.  Song structures may be quite uneven; whereas regular hip-hop is sample-based and loops set samples, alternative hip-hop plays with it by shifting samples around, or featuring live instrumentalisation.  But perhaps the most apparent is that one of the biggest parts of rap, hooks (or, “choruses”) are often considered optional and can be completely absent.  El-P, for instance, often discards or understates these parts.  Case in point:

Who is El-P?

El-P (initially El-Producto) is a rapper and producer from Brooklyn, New York.  Initially, he was a member of the rap trio Company Flow (El-P, Bigg Jus, Mr. Len) which was then-signed to Rawkus Records. After two albums (Funcrusher Plus in 1997 and Little Johnny from the Hospitul: Breaks & Instrumentals, Vol. 1 in 1999) the trio had a bad falling out with Rawkus over the label’s mistreatment of them.  El-P sought a solo career, and co-founded Definitive Jux Records in 1999.  El-P alludes to this in his track Deep Space 9mm (from his Def Jux debut, Fantastic Damage) with the line, “Sign to Rawkus? I’d rather be mouth-fucked by Nazis unconscious.”

El-P’s style is built on diversity made possible by the unity of opposites: the real and the fantastical, the outspoken and the hidden, the hard-hitting and the soft center.  His lyricism, his musical style reflects this.  His beats can be anything from extremely prevalent (and even oppressive) to being basic and almost fading into the background; the instrumentals employ a wide range from classical hip-hop synthesizers and live instruments to 8-bit sequencers. His lyrical content, often blending on-the-nose statements (“Why should I be sober when God’s clearly dusted out his mind?”) to the more cryptic (“Pure savage established hard rock circa ’93 proof”) and topically includes strong objections to how the world is run and what it has become, existential questioning of his own existence and where he stands in the world, science fiction stories about prison ship executioners falling in love with prisoners, and much more.

El-P’s identity as a New Yorker (and/or a Brooklynite) is significant to both his lyrics and how he appears: whether he’s wearing a hat or a beanie, it’s always tipped to the left, which he informed the audience that it was a Brooklyn custom.  He makes references to New York and Brooklyn frequently.  Further, having lived in New York myself, I can say that he gives a most accurate description of how it is (“On my New York shit it’s the customary bop: Don’t talk to anyone, look forward, mind yourself, continue walk.”) On an interesting note, his track Drones over Brkyln (from the 2012 Cancer 4 Cure) turned out to be prophetic when months after the fact, the news reel said military drones were spotted over Brooklyn.

Recently, El-P has gone into a collaboration with the Grind Time Official star, Killer Mike (he, too, had in 2012 released a wildly successful LP, R.A.P. Music) with whom he had worked previously on Tougher Colder Killer (from Cancer 4 Cure.) The project, titled Run the Jewels (referencing an LL Cool J song) is available for free downloading online, and displays El-P toning down the amount of sophistication in his style in favor of harder punches, perhaps to not act as a complete foil to Killer Mike.

Discography (as El-P; includes only main albums, foregoing his other work for the sake of focus)

(2002) Fantastic Damage

(2007) I’ll Sleep When You’re Dead

(2012) Cancer 4 Cure

Note: Definitive Jux Records today represents some of the most prevalent names in alternative hip-hop such as Despot, Cage, Dizzee Rascal, Cannibal Ox, Aesop Rock, and the deceased Camu Tao.

Sochi horse at the gates of the West

© Wikimedia Commons

Russia is turning back to the mentality of the Cold War, says the president of the United States Barack Obama faced with the fact that the political asylum to Edward Snowden was given by the Russian authorities as well as other controversial news from Moscow that reached the world in the last few days.

The reactions are similar in the White House where the people were very determined to “reload” the foreign relations with Russia. However, it seems that all the symbolic optimism and hand-shaking with Sergei Lavrov is going to be replaced by serious diplomatic discussions. The West expected that the end of the Cold War will also mean the end of Cold War geopolitics in Russia’s thinking, unfortunately, they were very mistaken. Russia never thought that the Cold War was over in the first place. Hate towards Western states triggered by communism, the wish to have its own unique “Russian” path in the world politics, despair and geopolitical weakness resulted in a certain type of messianic view of the international relations which is still very much alive in the thinking of Russian political elite.  It is true that for some time after the Soviet Union broke Russia was not powerful enough to compete with the Western world, therefore, the illusion that Russia will be ruled with accordance to the Western cultural and social values brought through capitalism was made. However, when Vladimir Putin and other ex-KGB’s as well as oligarchs loyal to Kremlin came into power, Russia re-grouped and started a new game. This rhetoric of the Cold War which bothered Obama, of course, is not the same as missiles in Cuba in 1965, but it covers an even more dangerous game that Russia plays with the West.

The game has started when the foreign companies started investing in natural resources rich Russia. As Edward Lucas, a famous British journalist, has noted, some companies have quickly understood the rules of business in Russia and given a chance started defending Russia’s way of politics so they would be first at getting biggest investments. However, the time came when the interests of business and politics started to mix and such persons like Gerhard Schroder replaced his political ethics with greed related to Gazprom. It is not surprising that the economic relations and the need to secure investments make some companies or even individuals defend and advocate Russia on the international level. When Russia was admitted to World Trade Organization despite all the critique of harsh handlings of certain social situations, undemocratic actions during the elections, the persecution of political opposition, it became clear that the freedom of trade and profits are now a priority over the individual freedom and human rights.

Considering Russia as equal member of various international organizations and even considering its leadership reminds French comic Remi Gaillard’s short films in which he, dressed with sports costume, pretends to participate in the game like any other player. It is true though, that Russia is not being expelled from the game unlike Remi who is banned from playin once everyone understands he is a fraud. Moscow is usually reacting to critique quite calmly and counter-argued that in Russia they are free to do whatever they think is appropriate. However, this does not apply to newly adopted laws which restric the activities of NGO‘s, opposition and possibilities ofprotests – meaning any political acts that would shatter Putin‘s regime. The last homophobic law which caused many discussions and controversies means that you can be arrested and punished for any information regarding homosexuality has become the last stroke. English actor Stephen Fry has written an open letter to David Cameron and asked him to acknowledge human rights violantions in Russia and boycott the Sochi games because Olympic spirit is all about equality and Russia clearly is not. However, it is unlikely that athletes who prepared for Sochi for four years will consider withdrawing from competing. It is pity that morals sometimes are too expensive for the West.

The Sochi Olympics is one the biggest victories of Putin. He not only convinced the Olympic Committee that Russia is capable to organize the games but also that it would bring many benefits for Russian citizens. It is not hard to notice that Sochi Olympics in a way are very similar to the 1936 ones in Berlin when Adolf Hitler was determined to show the power and strength of Nazi Germany as a leader of the world. Putin sees Sochi Olympics in a similar way. The most expensive winter Olympic games in the human history must end with the triumph of Russia, Putin’s triumph, to be more precise, because he needs make the West believe that he is worth respect.  And it does not matter that Russia’s laws are becoming more “Russian type of democracy” and leaving behind those who do not agree with them. It is not only the question of homosexuals’ rights in Russia, it is the question whether Russia needs those citizens who think and act differently?

What does it mean for ordinary Russian citizens who grew up in communism and just recently got the first look at the West and capitalism? In the country which suffered many social catastrophes and revolutions and in which there were practically no periods of peace, and talks about civil society and freedom never had much importance, any stability and sense of power is more than welcome. It is similar to what new middle class Russians experience when on holiday in Turkey, Egypt and so on. They can feel like Germans or French in the same luxury hotels, eating at the fancy restaurants and bragging about their properties. For them it is the opportunity to feel proud of their country and believe that indeed Russia is special, therefore, it must take a special place in the world politics.

It is strange and horrifying but the growing belief that Russia is special and politically promising comes back to the intellectual thinking. Some members of the Lithuanian Parliament are openly saying that the laws in Russia are the ones to be followed and encouraged. They also say that the West is doomed and it will take us down too with its liberal values and propaganda. It is clear that not everyone is intellectually mature and such nostalgia only proves that. Fortunately, these words will remain unheard because the Baltic States are socially with the West and it never was under Russia’s influence culturally anyway, therefore, Russia can only terrorize them using the gas argument. And it is not going to last for long. The energetic independence of the Baltic States is increasing and it obviously bothers Russia that is going to be more aggressive towards them.

The Sochi horse is approaching and brings new democratic values of freedom, civil society and equality and it also makes the West revalue its positions as well. As Lithuanian philosopher Stasys Šalkauskis once pointed out, Lithuania is in the unique place between the East and the West, it is a bridge between the two and it only depends on Lithuanians whether the “information attacks” and provocations of Russia will be ignored and dealt with rationally and whether Russia will have the courage to continue disrespecting the West.  Recent events proved that Putin has surrounded himself and others with the spirit of the Cold War and revanchist aspirations and at the moment of weakness the West can expect Sochi horse at its gate.

War of Two Pharaohs: Egyptian Summer 2013

© Wikimedia Commons

Revolution is roaming free over the streets of Egypt. Claiming lives of Egyptian people from different parts of the political spectrum since the toppling of Muslim Brotherhood by Egyptian Army after a series of mass protests, in last July.The Interim Regime and its godfather General Al-Sisi is facing the rage of the Islamists, the supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood and the people who are simply against coup-making.

16th of August was called “Friday of Wrath” because the tensions between sides are very high. The response from international community was mixed. French, German and the UK leaders condemned the violence and called the sides to stop fighting. Moreover, the EU aid to Egypt came on tatters as criticism towards the attitudes of both sides, especially on the Interim Government of Egypt. Barack Obama gave a speech on the issue, in midst of his vacation, calling joint military maneuvers off and mentioning that the US military aid to Egypt might be reviewed. Turkey named Wednesday’s events as a “massacre” and both Egypt and Turkey recalled their ambassadors in respective capitals. Scheduled joint military maneuvers were cancelled. On the other hand, Saudi Arabian King Abdullah stated that he supports the Interim Government and its fight with terrorism. Saudi Arabia supported the ousting of Morsi via the Al-Arabiya network.

Anti_Morsi_protest_march_at_28th_June_2013

Anti-Morsi protest on June 28th © Wikimedia Commons

   What happening since the fall of Morsi, shows us the dark side of the Egyptian democracy: lack of tradition. Armed clashes were present between the governmental forces of Hosni Mubarak (who was the long-running president of Egypt resting his power on the army and financial connections of Egyptian economy) and anti-Mubarak demonstrators in Tahrir Square movement in 2011. After Mubarak fell the country faced a rather bleak period of transition to democracy. After a referendum in which a new constitution was accepted, Muslim Brotherhood rose to seat of power in the following elections and its candidate for president Mohamed Morsi won as democratically elected leader of the country.

What followed soon was Morsi’s disregard for the will of the people who hadn’t voted for him, widespread allegations of corrupt power accumulation in the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood and economic failure. Towards the first anniversary of Morsi’s rise to power, the opposition massed thousands to Tahrir square to protest his “pharaoh like” behaviour. After days of protest, Morsi was toppled by the Egyptian Army under the guidance of General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. Muslim Brotherhood resisted to coup and started counter demonstrations. Turning violent at times, the demonstrations held by the Morsi supporters showed that the fight for power would not end easily.

Damietta_protests

 Supporters of Morsi demonstrate on July 5th © Wikimedia Commons

   Different responses to recent massacres were similarly differentiating while the coup was days old. The West seemed to take back its support from Morsi government after a year of failure and Saudi Arabia became a new friend for the Interim Government installed by the Egyptian army. Meanwhile, as close friends of the Morsi government, Turkey and Qatar acted on opposite ends: Turkish government rejected the legitimacy of the coup and rose its voice to support Morsi, while Qatar shifted its discourse from pro-Morsi to pro-Al-Sisi. This was caused by each government’s internal/external political interests.

   Turkish government was trying to shift domestic support around as it faced unrest beginning with 31st of May. Qatar was passing through a change in the government and priorities. The West was simply not willing to dirty its hands in yet another Middle Eastern Crisis. Civil War in Syria is waging in new fronts as radical islamist rebels are fighting with Kurdish groups in the north and with other rebels in other parts of the country. Interestingly enough, the patterns of alliances over Syria seem to overlap with connections supporting the sides in Egyptian turmoil. This does not mean the conflict in Syria will simply spill over to Egypt, however it means that the larger powerplay for the rule of Middle East has gained another front.

   Egypt is a traditional core for power since, well… Ancient Egypt, and difference between a powerful Egypt and an Egypt in turmoil will have effects that are miles apart from each other, on the Middle East, the Old World, and the Globe.

Not perfect but at least true story “Before Midnight”

still from a movie "Before Midnight"

Richard Linklater with Ethan Hawke and Julia Delpy come back to the big screens in order to put all points on love story of Celin and Jassy.

A train of thoughts

Romantic drama “Before Midnight” is a continuation of two movies “Before Sunrise” and “Before Sunset”. Continuation can be called successful only if one liked the first two parts to begin with. The truth is that this movie’s outline is the same as previous parts.

Thanks to deep, meaningful dialogs (we know this because talking was all this couple was doing in the first two movies) we can hear a story of life. Viewer becomes listener and after that – thinker. One can just close his eyes and listen stories, trying to image everything. Thoughts are flowing freely, nevertheless it catches you and somehow you start to think…

Exciting routine

Here you will meet Celin and Jessy again. They live together now. They undergo joy and despair of life together. They are still not married but have two twin girls. The most interesting thing – their life isn’t perfect, not a fairy tale. Daily life is grueling and it looks like there is always enough passion for dispute and discord.

It is possible that those who expect romance and sweetness from this movie can be left disappointed. This movie is more realistic and mundane. Sugar is dropping rarely, thus daily life of these two characters sucks one in and excites rather easily.

Before-Midnight-2

a still from a movie “Before Midnight”

Gives hope

Just because this part is more mundane and realistic, it is easy to identify yourself with main characters. It is not only easy, also a pleasure. Problems which one will see are understandable and well known for most of the people. There are no werewolf’s running in forest or sparkling vampires. It is soft and romantic in an everyday-life way. Not a perfect world suddenly becomes interesting and full of hope.

Viewers, who can’t identify themselves with first parts, will be able to do that in “Before Midnight”. The other question is will they like it or not… Anyway, this movie will give an emotion and how you will take it depends only on you.

Verdict 8/10

Even though movie “Before Midnight” is pleasurable to watch, it isn’t a movie which you will want to watch again and again. And the fact that this part is rather similar to first two movies doesn’t make it more special or more interesting in any way.

You must watch this movie if you liked first parts and you are very curious how this love story will end. But if first parts look too tiring and over pressed for you, “Before Midnight” will be the same.

“Samsara” – therapy for your eyes and ears

If you feel tired from the routine, don’t rush to the psychologist or SPA center. It is quite possible that the documentary “Samsara” will be the perfect therapy for you and bring you to a new life. Even the name of the movie (Samsara – the circle of life) says that something extraordinary is waiting for you.

There is no script, no actors and no words. And no need for them! It looks like the script, actors and words aren’t necessary if you want show beauty, greatness, paradox and sarcasm. Yes, I must admit that at first you will miss words but later you will forget about them. Soon you will remember the fact that you are in cinema just because other people will be eating popcorns.

This movie was filmed for five years in 25 countries and you will feel that too. The views are fabulous and soundtrack is really authentic. They are also quite stunning and if you think that in many ways the real view is better than view on the screen, you can just imagine the feelings people who really were there felt.

I would like to know, not only see

Landscape is fazing, the qualities of shots are dazzling, and exotica leave us breathless but while you are enjoying these things you start to think “where are they?” This question probably will not appear for those who can be proud of their knowledge in geography. But for those who have nothing to be proud in this area (for example – me) this question will pop.

On the other hand, it is therapy. There is no point to think “where these places exist?” You just need relax and enjoy. But if you wish to know where these things are, is stronger than the wish to relax, you can always use Google and find out.

1085504_10151885377777873_260199556_n

a still from the movie “Samsara”

Only those who sink gulp for air

Sure, soundtrack is perfect, views are stunning but for how long it can impress the viewer? You can’t moan all movie long. A person who was sinking also will not breathe deeply the rest time of his life. So, it looks like the movie has just begun but it doesn’t make impression anymore. “Wow it beautiful! It so beautiful!! Amazing! Nice… nice again…” Enthusiasm is going to fade and somehow you begin to wonder what time is it.

But we can’t say that makers of this movie didn’t see that. Actually, they tried to solve it. Contrast, irony and paradox take viewer attention and suddenly it in not boring anymore. Slowly the idea of shifting values will reveal itself and somehow world becomes similar to absurd comedy. The idea of this documentary is wonderful, however, it is not revealed so quickly as you may wish.

Verdict 9/10  

“Samsara” – is the really good therapy but it doesn’t give too much information like a documentary. “Art – documentary” – would be closer term to describe “Samsara”. But if it is the real documentary, they need to show us not only the breathtaking views but also the names of these views.

Anyway, watching “Samsara” is an amazing experience which you shouldn’t miss.  It looks like the whole world is in this one movie – secret, unfamiliar, wild, overwhelmed and devastated. So you should watch “Samsara” just to calm your simple human curiosity.

Akiu gydymas lazeriu

An Open Letter to David Cameron and the IOC

Stephen Fry © Wikimedia Commons

Dear Prime Minister, M Rogge, Lord Coe and Members of the International Olympic Committee,

I write in the earnest hope that all those with a love of sport and the Olympic spirit will consider the stain on the Five Rings that occurred when the 1936 Berlin Olympics proceeded under the exultant aegis of a tyrant who had passed into law, two years earlier, an act which singled out for special persecution a minority whose only crime was the accident of their birth. In his case he banned Jews from academic tenure or public office, he made sure that the police turned a blind eye to any beatings, thefts or humiliations afflicted on them, he burned and banned books written by them. He claimed they “polluted” the purity and tradition of what it was to be German, that they were a threat to the state, to the children and the future of the Reich. He blamed them simultaneously for the mutually exclusive crimes of Communism and for the controlling of international capital and banks. He blamed them for ruining the culture with their liberalism and difference. The Olympic movement at that time paid precisely no attention to this evil and proceeded with the notorious Berlin Olympiad, which provided a stage for a gleeful Führer and only increased his status at home and abroad. It gave him confidence. All historians are agreed on that. What he did with that confidence we all know.

Putin is eerily repeating this insane crime, only this time against LGBT Russians. Beatings, murders and humiliations are ignored by the police. Any defence or sane discussion of homosexuality is against the law. Any statement, for example, that Tchaikovsky was gay and that his art and life reflects this sexuality and are an inspiration to other gay artists would be punishable by imprisonment. It is simply not enough to say that gay Olympians may or may not be safe in their village. The IOC absolutely must take a firm stance on behalf of the shared humanity it is supposed to represent against the barbaric, fascist law that Putin has pushed through the Duma. Let us not forget that Olympic events used not only to be athletic, they used to include cultural competitions. Let us realise that in fact, sport is cultural. It does not exist in a bubble outside society or politics. The idea that sport and politics don’t connect is worse than disingenuous, worse than stupid. It is wickedly, wilfully wrong. Everyone knows politics interconnects with everything for “politics” is simply the Greek for “to do with the people”.

An absolute ban on the Russian Winter Olympics of 2014 on Sochi is simply essential. Stage them elsewhere in Utah, Lillyhammer, anywhere you like. At all costs Putin cannot be seen to have the approval of the civilised world.

He is making scapegoats of gay people, just as Hitler did Jews. He cannot be allowed to get away with it. I know whereof I speak. I have visited Russia, stood up to the political deputy who introduced the first of these laws, in his city of St Petersburg. I looked into the face of the man and, on camera, tried to reason with him, counter him, make him understand what he was doing. All I saw reflected back at me was what Hannah Arendt called, so memorably, “the banality of evil.” A stupid man, but like so many tyrants, one with an instinct of how to exploit a disaffected people by finding scapegoats. Putin may not be quite as oafish and stupid as Deputy Milonov but his instincts are the same. He may claim that the “values” of Russia are not the “values” of the West, but this is absolutely in opposition to Peter the Great’s philosophy, and against the hopes of millions of Russians, those not in the grip of that toxic mix of shaven headed thuggery and bigoted religion, those who are agonised by the rolling back of democracy and the formation of a new autocracy in the motherland that has suffered so much (and whose music, literature and drama, incidentally I love so passionately).

I am gay. I am a Jew. My mother lost over a dozen of her family to Hitler’s anti-Semitism. Every time in Russia (and it is constantly) a gay teenager is forced into suicide, a lesbian “correctively” raped, gay men and women beaten to death by neo-Nazi thugs while the Russian police stand idly by, the world is diminished and I for one, weep anew at seeing history repeat itself.

“All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing,” so wrote Edmund Burke. Are you, the men and women of the IOC going to be those “good” who allow evil to triumph?

The Summer Olympics of 2012 were one of the most glorious moments of my life and the life of my country. For there to be a Russian Winter Olympics would stain the movement forever and wipe away any of that glory. The Five Rings would finally be forever smeared, besmirched and ruined in the eyes of the civilised world.

I am begging you to resist the pressures of pragmatism, of money, of the oily cowardice of diplomats and to stand up resolutely and proudly for humanity the world over, as your movement is pledged to do. Wave your Olympic flag with pride as we gay men and women wave our Rainbow flag with pride. Be brave enough to live up to the oaths and protocols of your movement, which I remind you of verbatim below.

Rule 4 Cooperate with the competent public or private organisations and authorities in the endeavour to place sport at the service of humanity and thereby to promote peace

Rule 6: Act against any form of discrimination affecting the Olympic Movement

Rule 15 Encourage and support initiatives blending sport with culture and education

I especially appeal to you, Prime Minister, a man for whom I have the utmost respect. As the leader of a party I have for almost all of my life opposed and instinctively disliked, you showed a determined, passionate and clearly honest commitment to LGBT rights and helped push gay marriage through both houses of our parliament in the teeth of vehement opposition from so many of your own side. For that I will always admire you, whatever other differences may lie between us. In the end I believe you know when a thing is wrong or right. Please act on that instinct now.

Yours in desperate hope for humanity

Stephen Fry

 

Original source: stephenfry.com

Lauko Treniruokliai